The Karnataka Power Transmission … vs Sri Shivaramaiah on 2 June, 2009

EN TEE HEGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALQRE

DATEQ THIS TEE 2nd DAY OF JUNE 2009 1 _

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTiC§E;"AJYF    Ak

REVIEW PEPFFION No.%g«94%%%¢'F 2603 ~  1  

WRIT PETITION ;N9:343 01? 2008,  

BETWEEN:

1. The Karnataka Powef T1'a13$';11»1ssic>[I1.VV  ,
corporation Ltd»   V  
Cauvery   V'    ' 
Banga1ore%()9}i~'_. _   _'  
Represerite}._i.Vb§'*tJ:1e    
Chief  Qirccttiré, "  

2. Th6.,'Ba1iga1(3reV.  Supply
Comiaany,  
Bangaio_re~O1'.' A » V 
Represefitgé the 
 Din:-ctor, . . .PE'I'Fi'IONE3RS

A V ' V _ _V »A   Adv.)

sri"smva«m' mt" aiah,

~   S/9 Latr:"Sri Rangaiah,
' » Aged abaut 39 years,
' _ ' -Gaaxgman (Disconnection),
 __  Wmtefield Section Office,
"  ..,.E-4 Sub Division,

Bangalore. ...R]32SP(}NDENT

(Sri M.V.Chandrashekar Raddy, Adv.)



This RP is filed under Order 47 Rule 1 of Code of
Civil Procedure: praying for review of the order dated
25.06.2008 passed in WP 343/O8 on the file of the
Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka, Bangalore.

This RP coming on for hearing this day, the. 
macie the following:  'A :. 

Writ Petition was disposeglieoil 
directing the respondentsitoiieonsieer..t}2.e:'v_cl5éiiiii"'oi' theii

petitioner, if any, as arid was-;1ii itl3e””1r.gtcaiiCy”‘e1’VEtI1e need
arises subject to theta governing

the appoiritm_.eIi*é::9f

2.” f_1’hi_s is filed for review of the

ordei; _i119{sm:,1VCh1 only to clarify and add one

” issued requirixig the petitioner to

eligibility criteria. It is to be noticed that this

the respondent to consider of the

ease of ii the petiticmer sympathetically, but however,

regard to the Rules and Regulations. There

“*shoL1ld not be any impediment in observing that the

said consideration of the claim of the petitioner would fl

be subject to the directions issued and also°*~,the

eiigbility Criteria.

Petition stands disposed of;.éi颧rc’;itig13*’, ; % , ‘

fudgé

AI/-