High Court Karnataka High Court

The Karnataka State Road vs V Adinarayanappa on 28 June, 2008

Karnataka High Court
The Karnataka State Road vs V Adinarayanappa on 28 June, 2008
Author: S.Abdul Nazeer
---M w Mn-mam nlvn yuan} gag: Iuumunimsn mun cougar or mmnmcn may COURT or KARNATAKA men COURT or KARNATAXA may CODE!

an-3.-
t:*rns axes caurr or xnnxunnxn.nr nnnsanoan
namnn razs THE 28" may GE JUNE; iflfifi

BEFORE

THE HnN'BLE HR.JUSTI§E_S.AEDU$j§fi$EER. " 2

wax? ymrzrxoa nn.§4sq gr 2safi"(iK;ja 

THE mAnNaTAKa,sma3ssRnAn; f«

TRANSPORT coRE6ޣT:aNay;"

CERTRRL 029132 ; j~': ,_%j» ;

SARIGE sAn&un,_gHa§$H:x3eAg fa'

BaNGALogE~5$0 e2?€_9  .."u"VV

REP 3:_:rs{¢§IxE_Law_s$3Ic3fi; ... pzrxxxansn

i3y_sw¢§s§§3&$a é3a§§,:£Dv.:

v,An:fl%aAyAflA§E3*7
fifiwvmmmmfiuwmmmmyaa

';3K!G.W$TADEHfiSEHfiLLI Tflflfifi

eafifizninayua TAEUK

"_*Ig0zAg,§3$?RIcT ... R£S?0flfiENT

'={ny'$£i Lagsnaax Ran, Anv.3

, ; rams wax? PETITION xs FILED uunzn axmxcnx
'"226 ARE 22? or was CONSTITBTXOH or INDIA
pnn$:ne we can; yea ram RECORDS on znn
EDDITIGMKL Lasaua ccumr 3nNeALoaa yaamnxnxws
T0 I.D.HG.31f2OD3 BT. 6.2.2008 VIBE ANNEXURE c

FILEE BY THE RESPfiKDEflT HEREIN.



uvvnl ur nnmw-unna mu'-rl coultj KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF XARNATAKA HIGH COURT

-I-an

THIS WRIT EETITION CDENG ON EQR.
PPELIHIIIARY HEARIIQG - B G1-ECU? TI-{I5 .EAY, THE
CCFURT EEESSEB THE FOLLGWING:  

Though, this matte:§W§.$"«3,i$teci.fiV:f'c;.*:_"c$rd.éns;__ 

by the zmmsent -916 the  ':v"'.:11e:
partials, it is takon;V~lfi;p, fizz-x2'*--tfin:i1.  

diapvs-ad of by  'claim  éétdléx " C' - ._

2. Thev  working as 9.
condugt  A   Stiéir-carparati an . He
wag pursuant to an
a:é¥;1e;~  fciiaciplinary authorities.

'£hia¥.Lci:i.asa;is§ééA;l..Hzgives rise to an industrial

Vyégiisput-Q  ,,   zcaspandaant tiled an
  Hwtézxzder secticn 1I.'>(4-A) of the
 nisgutes Act if;r: shark 'the Act' }
A"''3:a:9£i:i:s:*§:'*.A:hsa II Aczdl. Labour Court, Bangalore in

 A. .xI)';£-39.31303. During tha pendency of the

VV"'p'}<:cesdin.gs, respondent filed an application

aaekitag interim xnalief. The Labour Court: haa

pa.-359$ an order: an 8.2.2008 grantzizxg a arm at

M

‘R

._ ………t.’.A M_.,_f ………..-ma mum uauxr or mnnamm men COURT or KARNATAKA HIGH couzrr or KARNATAKA HIGH COURT

$31
Rs.5,QGGf- par msnth tawaxds interim relief.
Feeling aggrieved by the aa;dLa Qzder,

getitianer has tiled this writ pg§if£é§;ft }

2. I have heard tfie:1afirfi§d ¢§fifiaeiQfotV:

tbs §axtias.

3. Laarné@fl’¢afin§§i4 f§r_ tha petitioner
would c¢nt¢md:thfi§:#§% i&fi§fifi;Court was not
§usti$§§$ §fl§n ‘fi%i#gg ifi§arim reliaf at
Ra.”$_§ ém submits that the
1a%t_tfi%awnP»w§§§§–fo£ the respandent was

Ra.§;253f*=fifiififikififiluded all other benefits.

_$h$;af$reg th# noun: fixed by the Labour

‘”«_ Cofi£t i$ excaasiva.

; #f’Gn the other hand, learnsd ¢oun5el tax

VauV th§*”nespandent would contend that deupite

V *§£ant at sufficient epportunitias, the

petitianer has failsd to lead the evidence

befara the Laban: Court. The matter is or the

M

R

~..umu ur !\AKNA¥Al§A I-HG!-E CO9?’ KARNATAKA HIGH COURY OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT

1 n 1
year 2093. “…’har-arore, the rzaspondant had no
other nption but to claim intexim r§Li&f;_ The

Labour (mutt on consiciaratian £3f__–3£ii§’>v:.’};}§1i:i’&_;{.;i§,_£!.1

C-n :::&<:«::::o::1 hag granteciiug'

taswazda interim z:eali:e:4f.::'''O..:' ':

dismissal of the writ«–.._pef2iti'-31;.

5. The L«é.%z;.$i1; raxfizx that the
enquiry petiti<;:m:r-

praper. The
V2093. It ia alas:

-szv:r5′.:,V”.»:’.?.4=3;.’:§iA:AVV”O”E:’1i.-.::1.i_:.V’Ai”w’;£:%_i”}%:x.ae’.:j,’i:ia-nar has failed ta lead

evidtanca agapi%:e grant of auffiaient

V, ‘rho Labour Ceuxt had imposed
the p-atiticrnar: thxae times. It
fxom the pay alip that tzha gross

A of the raapondant was Ra.4,253.«’-.

A. __.§3%riia:.i.cie:ing the Q’.t:$l3 salary of the

VO”.f:e:spe-indent, the interim relief granted by the:

Labour Ceuzt ia axcessive. : am c:~f the View

that it is just ané propex ta grant interim

é’

‘Ox:

.- ……..,…_ ……… .A i_….V5 …….«…..-W. nium wax: or amxunrnxn men cook: or KARNATAKA men COURT or KARNATAKA Him couar

.. 5 ..

relief at P.s.3..f:0Gf- per manth. _I.aarnad
counsel fan: the petitioner assures_4v~tV}*s§’i*-._r;:tz.r:t

that the patitionar–Co:paratir;7:{é..ii’%s?i’;;3;i-‘.._._Tt:g-

aperate with the I.ahour_£;gu:t’.’;’i.i1″‘

the matter at an eazly §’:1aLtrge.”. .. 3 A

6. In the” faallewing
eraser: A i A.

Ci) VV§§i»;i.§i’§:fii;v”fiucceeda and it
4 “}f_j .. :&;ilos-:ed- in-p art: .

granted. by tha

– Court 3.5 reduced to
per month. In other
” the respondent is smtitlad
interim relief at B.s.3,500/-
pex month fram the date :01′. the
applicatian i.a., ‘I.9.2£30’I.
Liiiii The petitioner in directed 12:: pay
arrears at interim relief at the

afezureaaid rate within a. pexiod of

four weeks .

W

vwnl wt’ nnmflfltl-\l\.H mun uuuljff KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA I-“GR COURT

(iv)

H31′!

‘.t’ha Laban: Caurt is directed “to

dispose of the matte:

pariod of six months

Ho coats . _