The Kothamangalam Municipality vs M.I. Abdul Kareem on 21 January, 2009

       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

RP.No. 72 of 2009()


1. THE KOTHAMANGALAM MUNICIPALITY,
                      ...  Petitioner
2. THE SECRETARY,KOTHAMANGALAM MUNICIPALITY

                        Vs



1. M.I. ABDUL KAREEM , S/O. IBRAHAM,
                       ...       Respondent

2. SHEEJA ABDUL KAREEM  AGED 38 YEARS,

3. THE KOTHAMANGAM MUNICIPAL COUNCIL,

4. NIMMI NAZAR, W/O. NAZAR, CHARI PERSON,

5. VIJU THOMAS, S/O. THOMAS, VICE

6. NAZAR KUNJI, MULAKKAKUDY,

7. THE DISTICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM.

8. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE

9. AZHEER HUSSIN, S/O.MOIDEEN PALATHINKAL

10. THE TAHSILDAR, (LAND ACQUSITION),

11. THE LAND REVENUE COMMISSIONER,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.ALEXANDER JOSEPH

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice PIUS C.KURIAKOSE

 Dated :21/01/2009

 O R D E R
                       PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE J.
                      ------------------------
           R.P. 72/2009 IN W.P.(C)No.18092/2008
                      ------------------------
             Dated this the 21st day of January, 2009

                            O R D E R

It is submitted on behalf of Sri.K.K.Chandran Pillai, learned

counsel for the writ petitioners, who are the respondents in the

Review Petition, that the Ground No.’A’ in the Review Petition

will show that the Municipality is presently agreeable to have an

enquiry under Section 5A conducted. On going through the

Ground No.A, it is seen that the Municipality has become

agreeable to have enquiry under Section 5A conducted. The

review petitioners only want the enquiry under section 5A be

conducted immediately.

In view of Ground No.A, I feel that there is justification for

recalling my judgment. I allow the review petition and recall the

judgment.

Post the Writ Petition before the appropriate court for

hearing/disposal.

PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE,JUDGE

dpk