IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD
DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF DEcEMBER,~~20_0;é__’__L-
BEFORE
THE 1-ION’BLE MR.JUsT1;CE fi ;B1LI,APEA’: =
WP. No.64037Tw/20o9′:«–,A;RES) ::; f * V ‘
Between:
1 The Land Acqui.éit~i;Qn officaéj;
And Asst.ComrniSs=.io.ner ”
Dharwad T ”
2 The E:>:.r..s’ETITIoNERs
3. T1VV1V’k3:farnsV’a._ _ ..
‘ ~ S/ 0 Tu-}._iaa’r1’sa Jituri
» _W./c.._Tu1__<_aramsa J ituri
vSlL1uIV'$SVf?.V
Sf ffukaramsa J ituri
4 " .,._fayachand
"S/0 Tukaramsa Jituri – .. RESPCNDENTS
(By Sri. Dinesh M Kulkarni, Adv for R-2-4)
This WP is filed under Articles 226 82; 227 of the
Constitution of India, praying to quash the order dated
22-$2009 gassed by the Civil Judge (Sr.Dn} "in
E.F'.No.135/ 003.
This WP coming on for preliminary _
the Court made the fo11owing:~
oRDEa;gw3
The learned Governrnenti:i§dvocate—- the
amount has been deVp’ositedp.:befo1feit1=1e Exedcutingi Court.
The learned counsel for the submits that
amount has_.pbef¢1a1de;;5§it’c}i tizeflfilitecuting Court.
Therefore, the petitio_ri if not survive for
consideration.
Accordinghfl’ the ~ disposed of, as it
does not survive. for coinsideration
_____ Sd/..
1 JUDGE