High Court Kerala High Court

The Malabar Educational & … vs The Dental Council Of India on 13 April, 2007

Kerala High Court
The Malabar Educational & … vs The Dental Council Of India on 13 April, 2007
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 12973 of 2007(T)


1. THE MALABAR EDUCATIONAL & CHARITABLE
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE DENTAL COUNCIL OF INDIA,
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY

                For Petitioner  :SRI.KURIAN GEORGE KANNAMTHANAM (SR.)

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice S.SIRI JAGAN

 Dated :13/04/2007

 O R D E R
                                 S.SIRI JAGAN, J

                -----------------------------------------

                      W.P.(C)NO.12973  of 2007

                -----------------------------------------


                Dated this the 13th  day  of  April,  2007



                                 JUDGMENT

The petitioner is a Trust which has applied for sanction of a

Self Financing Dental College. The application was submitted in

2005. In the meanwhile in January 2006, the regulations were

amended and the Dental Council insisted on fresh Essentiality

Certificate for consideration of the petitioner’s application. That

was also granted. The Dental Council took a stand that they

would consider the application of the petitioner only in

accordance with the amended regulations. Therefore, the

petitioner represented to the second respondent Union of India

by Ext.P10 for relaxing the rigour of the amended provisions for

applications pending at the time of introduction of the amended

regulation. The petitioner now seeks a direction to the second

respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P10.

2. I have heard the learned Counsel or the petitioner and

the Central Government Standing Counsel as also the Standing

W.P.(C)No.12973/2007 :2:

Counsel for the Dental Council of India. After hearing all

concerned, I feel that it is only fit and appropriate that the

second respondent considers Ext.P10 and passes appropriate

orders thereon as sympathetically as law would permit. This the

second respondent shall do within a period of one month from

the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE
css
/

W.P.(C)No.12973/2007 :3:

W.P.(C)No.12973/2007 :4: