The Manager H N Travels vs Sri R K Prakash on 8 September, 2008

1

EN WE HIGH COURT OF KARNAYAKA AT BANGALORE'--'-.__p

mcrezj THIS THE 3'?" mm' 0:: SEPTEMBER 209$ 'T 

EEFGRE

THE HQNBLE MR. 3usT:cE3AwAa.ap;a:g§"    'V

EETWEEN:    '

1 THE MANAGER
HNTRAVELS  - 
SETUA'?'ED AT No.2, $;L§3AT;'riA;;£O'M;PLEX_
FIRST mm READ, GA!~£.E§HIi*!AGA¥?,     k
Ba'-WGALORE      

2 "ma BRAf*iCHV>.?~GA-%¢fa§5E?g~«..,v  A    

H NTRAVELS»-.    .&  
s:':*um'Ec% A: NAWAL .H€>TE{;*»w 
rvzzsszeas ST'?xEET,"4BUǤiDE_R. %
HAMGEKLQRE      
 _     % wrzrzomsas
(By Smt. sAr~:ca%rA as 9aAam;L%Aov.)

 : 3.5 3 ..  A'  '  ..... .. V

  ;;a}yAsr: 5 PRAMQD, ABV.)

 % .-S'R§_R.vK'PvRA"%(.ASH
 % mow:  kwzsm ENTERPRESES
L NC'.2?9,' §'_if;"{?' FLOOR, M.3.MARKE'r
(£3-'.PP:,.__'SRI; RAGHAVEN DRA SWAMY TEMPLE)
 CHIKPET,
% x aAm,xmae-see ass)
  Rssmwoewr

 kT%%jj::z=.zz*.j REVISIOFS i>ET£TIC>N IS FILED u/5.115 or czar:
flx£5AI.9éST THE Jmemem AND nscass 9T.21.11.2C107
 "M5389 zras S.C.NCi.1336f2006 are "me me 0? THE mz

/j1«Cé/~

 



"3
an

ADDL. SMALL causes Jumse, BANGALORE, 9E present. Heard bath
sides'  _.  _   . .

3. ita faété .".av§e'sia7nf'far."ccznsiéeratian are:

 _ *=2S.'?..'2G66AvéfiicAiv 98.2006, 1" respondent herein-

to have entrusted aarceis ccrntaining

V wrifif *.1sa*J3tC_’;¥1é.”‘§j :EtCéV the defendant-H.N.Traveis which has its

“* 5i:’f <bt:m§cin§ 'E:-fgffice at Garxéhinagar, Bangaiere, and daiivery

"r§f?é:e..3f9Mangaiore fer riieiivering the same is: M/5 Gurukripa

' j'A!:."1:facfers and WS Karthik Enterprisfi, Mangaiere, an

éiayment cf £25.39/'– tcwards transpartatien ciharaes.

:-5
f

fpiairztiff. Parties are permitted to fead evidence in

regard and subfitarxtiate their raspective conterem-ns.__.«5_ "' 5.fj[: :

v§fi*