2. Smt.Hes:]amm,
W!o.?2z°'mhx::apps. G-owda,
Agw 48 ymm,
Egg. Kabsalm I-image;
mm Vwga
mm Taluk, ma.
3. F.Y::zgiah' Rafi,
-fa. C..3rin.imsa Rae,' __ V
Agw 34ysara, '
KR]a.R%1=1"?$h1aa {l:3zz;§:»:1un:1,. ' V
,«.; re -. ..;R ESPOi'€DEH'I'S.
(Rmwsndent-1
Hctzixze ta. _Rasp;:z1da;:=.t-'3
kmn 3-CU.) cf
Workf.%_1cm~' Cfimwmafién Act, 1923 against the Award
clatafi ':23-47-2903 by thm Commisakmszr for
Worwmis' Ctampérisaflnn as Iawur Ofimg Difiasiezx II,
D,K§ ' ¥Qfflw;V fiffifig] SR H¢::.55f 2{3C32{F).
on for Ordem an the Miami:
legality and validity zzzrf the order passed by the
_ " =.{Li03 is
W
called in quastion in tlfm awal by the £sppe31a11t-
Insurancc Cempany.
2, Respondents 1 ma 2 lodged a clém the
Conmxisflonw’ ¢1mEning c an on ‘cf
am’ am R wins ma ffzraifii _ ;+§%m 1: 3 gm %
mhmgmg 1-as arms as Lg-:s.2acé:i %
at abcm 9-66 am. On gin ma wag
proceeding in the Tmkf .9661 when it mm
with $1 §n.% a;L:a%m»,g§% 1,; am driving of the
fiver,” 19:: mm c;m- M g asserted that
he w%gg§i.ag sa1fit§§i’éfi§;si’;4+fifiG!-. The Cermn1’ssim:.e:r avzaried
3 susfzzi sf
% ‘ W is the ownm of the vehicle. He did
I 1_’ ‘case nor denied the claim. The %11a:r:t–
mm” “W 3: ma ebjmcms’ A TI1w:a.ficr, thc clmmmats’
& & Lmagzviamce. Tha Cnm::n:2sm’::>11m* helamg the: mem existed the
crf master mi mg-vmt: and étceased um gcfiing
V’ salmy cf Rs.2,60fl:’«- pm manth, awarded the c m. This
$cfleémqws§mmfifi5apped.
4. The only gzmd uxgad by aw insumtzce is tha
écccageé W ms, go-mg 33133? of Rs.3,5aa;.
mama; of 21:: damaged has mt Batu pggwed b§.r~’§i§$: K V. >
5; A-dmiixedly, the m¢1aya%m%%gg: %
pm}! is the decwei T1’1erefe:£:_v, “*i;t_’is L’
cszrgmy to cemmd thm; of Rs.
35%;. par mam. was sf flm gm-
zaaz. em:-lie welzlé
have 2: cmrmt he mntended
cm Rs.3,6{I8i- W month. In
the %m%my 1:13:13′: ’31 tlfis W31.
‘s::::i. The memzzinaepomt’ is
. V. ” eanxmzs’ mum’ .
saI-‘-
}UDGE
sa/-I
JUDGE