in THE man coum’ or .
cmcurr amen K1′ ‘-
DATED mm THE 2231* 5.05;?
%m<mI%=A4 %
THE Homzw MR. 2-1,15. ugémom ms
M.m§; 2§é_.__s__1g._,
Bnmnsxz
THE _ "
THE SA;UN!’}A’i*i’}’_TALiJK1%._,V A
AGRICULTURAL PRQDUCEYJ, ;
coyapsamxva; MARKETING .S{)CIE’I’Y um.
SA1UNDA’i’?i_-vTALIJK–, SAUNDA’I”i’I msmxcr,
BELGAUM * .j~ » …APPELLANT
(3.? SRi. M ARUN PO’L”APPA, ADV.)
” mm€ii.=J$1HussA1N KAMALSAB MAHUT,
max) 35 YEARS, SAUNDATTI TALUK,
” SAUNBATTI DISTRICT,
V’ ~ B-‘ELGAUM.
2. THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER,
P~¥A’I’IOi\¥AL INSURANCE CO., LTD,
DIVISIQNAL OFFICE,
RAMDEV GALLI,
‘>4z~~%w
BELGAUM BISTRICT,
BELGAUM. …REsR0r§'{)ENTs
(BY SR1. GR. GURUMATH, ADV. FOR R1
R2-SERVED) ”
THIS APPEAL IS FILED )3}! S 1?3i’1}’Lii’€§F~»:i
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AW;&RE.’ UgA’.IfE!}: 4.’3.2006
PASSED IN MVC NO.84-4/2005 ‘ON Tilfil F’iLE~ OF ‘ms “t;%1v1L ”
JUDGE(SR.DN.) AND MEMBER, ADDL. Mam,’ 3AUiiDM*r1L,
AWARDING A COMPENSA_’_I’i{}N OF’ RS, ‘4,52’;:.>.:5,!–w: WI’FH
INTEREST @ 8% RA. FROIWTHE BA’1’E2 PEFITION TILL
REALISATION.
THis’TvL’;z2R1_=£:AL«. C::)_z»£ir~53 ON FOR ADMISSION THIS
13AY~,_’mE COURT? {DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
1′ V ‘ gpBGMENT
Vie cizvréfiitfs appeal against tint: awaxd dated
vd$;~.o3;2aQ6 gassed” in we H0644] 2005 passed by the
V $'{d§1i;–v.:§:2Ifisf’03f Af:ci(1e:{1t Claims Tribunal, Satmdatti.
perused the iznpugneé award. Fmm the
éperaiifit cf the impugnad awaxd it is seen that the
f7″””*£.. aw
net liability is not fixed on the appe11ant«owI§ér.’
the appellant is not aggrieved byMfj1e ” ., u
Accordingly, the appeal is