The Manager vs The State Of Kerala Represented By on 22 December, 2010

       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 37045 of 2010(E)


1. THE MANAGER, KSB SCHOOL,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS,

3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION,

4. THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.U.BALAGANGADHARAN

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.T.SANKARAN

 Dated :22/12/2010

 O R D E R
                      K.T.SANKARAN, J.
           ---------------------------------------------
               W.P.(C).No.37045 of 2010 E
           ---------------------------------------------
         Dated this the 22nd day of December, 2010




                        JUDGMENT

The petitioner is the Manager of KSB School,

Karippode, Palakkad. According to him, during the

academic year 2006-2007, a vacancy of Full Time Sanskrit

Teacher arose on the retirement of one Mrs.Thylambal. It is

stated that Thylambal was working as Full Time Sanskrit

Teacher on the basis of Group C diversion. The petitioner

appointed Sheebamol as Full Time Sanskrit Teacher in the

vacancy of Thylambal. The Assistant Educational Officer

approved the appointment of Sheebamol only as a Part Time

Sanskrit Teacher. Challenging that order, the petitioner

filed appeal before the Deputy Director of Education, who

dismissed the appeal as per Exhibit P3 order dated

30.3.2007. On further appeal to the Director of Public

Instruction by the Manager, that appeal was also dismissed

WPC No.37045/2010 2

as per Exhibit P4 order dated 18.3.2008. The petitioner

challenged Exhibit P4 order in Exhibit P5 revision before the

Government under Rule 92 of Chapter XIV A of the Kerala

Education Rules. Exhibit P5 is pending disposal.

2. Though several reliefs are claimed in the Writ

Petition, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that

for the time being, it is sufficient if a direction is issued to the

first respondent to dispose of Exhibit P5 revision at the

earliest.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the

learned Government Pleader.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, the Writ

Petition is disposed of as follows :

The first respondent shall consider and dispose of

WPC No.37045/2010 3

Exhibit P5 revision dated 10th July 2009, submitted by the

petitioner, as expeditiously as possible, and at any rate,

within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a

copy of the judgment, after affording an opportunity of being

heard to the petitioner and the teacher appointed by him,

namely, Sheebamol. The petitioner shall produce a copy of

the Writ Petition and certified copy of the judgment before the

first respondent.

K.T.SANKARAN
JUDGE
csl