The Managing Director Ksrtc vs Santhosh Paul on 5 August, 2008

Karnataka High Court
The Managing Director Ksrtc vs Santhosh Paul on 5 August, 2008
Author: V.Gopalagowda & Nagaraj
R3 1% HIGH COURT OF KARRATAKA AT 

mmozn um um am pm: or AIJ'G'US__'.'£'°9.:A."2'(Ai€;l8§5:   

TI-IE Horrnm MR.JU8'I'ICE   Ak   T

mn%_ % A %  
TI-IE Horraw  

 

1 THE 

K.H.12oADf 'SHA;§fi£'H1NAGAR'v'VVV-- 

    & ;
REP.'-.§3Y TEH  "F_1'.AW. OFFICER
 .  * 
BANGALQRE  X

. .. APPELLANT

 mar  :  A swam' ADV )



....___..

  sAN'rH0sH PAUL

~ $11 ISSAC

 V.A('§E:D mom 52 YRS

%   SM'r PRABHAVATHY

 W/0 SANTHOSH PAUL
AGED ABOUT 49 YRS
BOTH ARE R/AT N0.'-am EAST ROAD

<_____C"'\a-fin.-,___'_,_



1»)

AUSTIN TOWN BANGALORE 47  RESPONDENTS

(By M/S LAWYERS CENTRE FOR C/R1&2 ) T

MFA FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT A<§A1;q%si§A§\AeL:eAe,iéiE* _
JUDGMENT AND AWARD DA'1'ED:O3 /04/zooee PASSED IN. *

MVC 190.5199/2004 ON THE FILE OEWTHE VI SCJ-IA AIJDL,
JUDGE, MEMBER MA<::'r,

BANGALORE, (SCCH- 2), AWARDING' COMPEN.SA7I'£O'i§"'~(§F._
Rs.4,2s,ooo/- WITH cosrs & 'AT 'rave 5-§.A,k F'_ROM_ *.

THE DATE OF mrmom TILL DEPOSIT. A A

THIS APPEAL COMING 0N,.-FOR £~A¥, ARALI
magma, J. DELIVERED 3;~\2s;*1:~re%;

The the correctness of
the impugned datefi 3.4.2006 passed by
the 2) (hexeinafter referred to as
M.V.C.No.5199/04.

heard the aI’glHIlC1″ltS of the learned

for both the parties and perused the

jtiiiment and award and also the entire material

‘ ‘ ‘ A oh ‘final reconis.

Smtsumangala Aswamy, learned counsel for the

strongly contended that the Tribunal

committed serious ermr in not acoepthlg the of

KW. 1, the driver of the KSRTC bus bearing No.I ‘ 0f thré

of P.W.2-Dayanand who wag. pilliéixj cycle
which was driven by the deg ‘% 33:69″ other material

on record has the driver of

the said bus’ by driving the same in
rash and .

4. documents Ex.P}., complaint
Uniésli—-who wimcssed the accident. Ex.P4

iI1qu__c:s$,_ I”P;I}G!jf;,». scene of offence pans ££.__x.P8

‘ rm anti’: $33910 copy of the charge sheet, it could be

— that nfifise decuments clearly establish that the said bus

in the said accident and the same was driwen by

h in a rash and negligent manner. Ex.P10, copy of

charge sheet further reveals that the ixlformant Umcsh,

3/0 of Deva1″aju, resident of Byrapatna village, Clmnngpauia
taluk, who lodged the complaint Ex.P1 stating mazeaieeisaga

ae<::ide:r1t was caused by the KS1-"€'I'C bus which

the place of mad' em after hittingV.e'dIe–. the E

P.W.2 Dayanand has been s11ee§€§vifiii5S's'V:IVio.2;" V

His evidence also clearly' Wfifle'~kfie1self and
the ciweased were moving the driver at' the

said bus, by it maxmer,

clashed eyes the said accident.

5. uimm was falsely lodged and the

charge s1_1_eetV “w%as submitted by the gmlice

ériver, the appeliant-Corporation could

we getting the FIR/charge sheet quashed.

on record to show that any steps were

_ by the appeHant~Corpora£ion in that regard. Therefore,

find any reasons to ilaterfezre with the findings’

e by the ‘i’:ribunal as to the occurrence of me said

*–._ ‘aecident on the said date, time and place as a result ofmim

r’-“””‘~”‘

rash and negligent driving of the bus belongng

appeflam:-Corporat:Lon by its driver. Since the

not filed any appeal or cross»-objection file.’

correctness of the finding as.

compensation awarded by the; ~ the at ,

undisturbed.” V V V

5. For the _ appeal
deserves to be dismiS9’°dA&….a:%9. any merit.

Accordingly, judgment and
award of amount deposited
before in L fifaxasmitted to the Tribunal
concerned to withdraw” the same. No

” ….. .. V

Sd/-3
Judge

Judge

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *