' ANmU1j'H--. _S/{} S B POORNESHA
'.3. SR1 ASHOK SHNAJI MANE Q3'); A s MANE
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALQR§j"--.
Dated: This the 1'1"" day of March '. ' 'A
BEFORE 'lj_ i _ L_
THE HON'BLE MRJUSTICE ?§z.JA§}A«;vNATHA:;q-- ' _ T f
M.F.A.NO. 735312003′ %:M;v) = A .
BETWEEN:
THE MANAG;NG I)iI2E<:.'rro:R }<s_RfI"<:,
K.H.ROAE), CENTRAL'OFFf3iE
. BANGALORE .,
THROUGH CHIEF' LAW ;12’E=1’«»:;;3*.I”e- «V
HLIBL; ” ‘
.. . * A’ ….APPELLAN’F
(By S17″. K NAG.AR,AJA—-, A45»; ) *
AND :
1 319:1 33 PO0RjN.EsH2:.s–/0 BQMMAIAH
AGED AB01IT”’27..Y’EARs
R/0 SABU. VILLAGE
‘Q BA;~IAKAL._Hc:>BL§ 55 POST
” MUD.{_GEF-2131″ ALUK, CPKCKMAGALUR QISTRICT
Ar3§E.:) A BOU’I’ 7 YEARS, MINOR REP. BY HIS
. ?ATI’§LjER?/ NATURAL GUARDIAN :?–1
._ R_,!’G .sABLI VILLAGE
BANAKAL HQBLI 8:. POST
MUBIGERE TALUK, QHICKMAGALUR D¥S?RiC§’i”
s/0 SHIVAJI
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS
;{.s.m’.c: DRIVER
JAMAKHANDI 95130′?
BAGALKOT msraicz”
RESPQNDENTS
3
KSRTC has given a complaint against the jeep driver.
Therefere, based on the above material and evid.e13ee.V_
of the bus driver, the submission made _
finding of rzegligenee reeexde-gei j; T_
requires interference ‘the qtgméezjifi hf
eemmnsatien.
4. In the the V’-e§’r.:*-I.’.:t1i:’=;si1’1 put
ferwerd, I zeeord and
find that en: of the fact that a
case driver and it is
eiear sheet. In addition,
no eomplejht ‘age.insA:;t-,_»” jeep driver has been plaeeé
..,_Ao:1._’:}’j11:eee;11:;’s:i. “t.I*;i;–diy, the spot mahazar produced
jeep was extensively damaged and its
em: and moreover the hack wheeis of
‘*.,t:he jeepewere found just touching the main door from
Hi§h0tpa¥:h. In other Words, the wsition of the jeep
V. the damage eaueeci to it gives an indication that
the bus mus: lmve hit the jeep and ied to the jeep
heing eempleteiy eiamaged. Therefore, the everali
$52