A0'
'jf_ {VBY---§SRI V s NAIK, ADVOCATE)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 13"! DAY OF NOVEMBER 2009
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. P.D. DINAKARAN. G» H
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUsTIcEA:"2r1.G--._$ABH};HIT 2 "
Writ Apnea} No.43 2:909 iL:;EH)j';
BETWEEN . ' A'
1 THE MANAGING DIRECTOR
ADARSHA FILM 11\:s'I'1fI.'I.1f_IE.,
NO 39,NET1;iAJ1V..R0zgD,? H
CLEVALANI?)
~
[BY SR1 sfx}? '
1 SMT M K
W;/0 SR1 M.I}..._APPAIAH
_ AGEDABOUT 44""1*EARS
, SMI'i"HA I CROSS,
" _ 'i{;_'AD"B"c,0LQNY, PEENYA INDUSTRIAL AREA
BANGALCQE: 560058
THE DIRECTOR
_' .. DIRECTORATE op' KANNADA AND CULTURE
V NFLUPATHUNGA ROAD
'BANGA[.ORE 560 002 RESPONDENTS
pavnd eqtvritig. 1
2. Both the parties at the intervention of the well-wishers agreed
to compromise the dispute inter se, in the following teVrrns}V._
(1) The respondent no.1 has agreed to receiver”-a.f;sti:ié for
Rs.2,75,000/– (Rupees Two Lakhs Seventy Five
as fuil and final settlement of her c__|.airn_ pandjisiheé’doesinotfpressi
for reinstatement. Apart from Rs.:=2_v,7!i,’-,-()(A).e’i”:/’4–‘*rrshe’ h-a4s”‘n:e.___cEa=;ni
whatsoever against the Appetlpant inciuding Grattn’.t;;r’Aand it
(2) Appetlant agreed for such oft’er”made’Vb3r__ tiieirespoyndenit no.1″
and today has tendered RS.2,75_,_d0Q/_- by rneansof Demand Draft
bearing No.308348 da+__¢a o3.;_”11,2foo9V_ ‘drawn on Hcanara Bank,
Benson Town Branch, Bangalore-f-artist’ _
(3) The Respondent:’i=~£o.T a:i’s’o”‘dees ictaim whatsoever
from the Appauagaz in
THER§;’FORE.;’:if. A’pp’e!lant”_'””an”d the respondent No.1
respectfutEy:”‘pra’y:_that ‘Coort may be pleased to dispose of
the above appea’:-in =tern:s of thedoint Memo, in the interest of justice
‘(APPBEla*n.t) ” _ ” . V V (Respondent)
at W-
(Advocate foiflrxppéellant) (Advocate for Respondent)
‘4 H ” ‘Ba,-igaiore
.pate:o3.”rr.2oo9
2. The memo for disposal along wiih the joint memo is
placed on record.
3. The appeal stands disposed of, in ”
dated 11.11.2009.
Index: Yes/No, ____ a 4
Web Host: Yes’/No’ ” x .V V15,
vrp/~ ‘ — V