High Court Karnataka High Court

The Mngt Of National Institute Of … vs K Loganathan on 20 September, 2008

Karnataka High Court
The Mngt Of National Institute Of … vs K Loganathan on 20 September, 2008
Author: Ram Mohan Reddy
-1-

11»: THE HIGH mm? or ' x 

DATED THIS THE goth my as sEf?§i'E1m3E:%, ":3;eQs;:;f*
BE'§'Q]§E         %
THE HONBLE MR'.JUST1§__§E- .,taA1;;5 mam f:?E1:)1>Y

WRIT P2:'rrr1c;:$i%'No;*% 2€§S,;2'?'--/[2t§G4_ (L--RES)
WRIT Em}? I(f;m*~:t::g. ;4'E».2.6V2/'.2:}A{s4(L-RES)

_ w w m m -_

THE MANAGmgi:«§NT"§Jr N;m:3NAL""
INST£"I'U'TE OF M1+:?~ETAi, 1a;«:.2a::m
AND NEURO .SCIEN'£3E.$;' g£3SU--~R ROAE
BANGALORE 27%   ._  '
REP BY' ms REGISTRAR-, 
;' 'V _   '" '  PETYFIONER
 .....  (COMMON IN BOTH
THE PETITIONS)

 ';;--B§rVs.{-i ': v.§%1j~B 'éi{:A?f 455 P 13 VISHWANATH, ADV )

Amt: 

'A V' *  LQTGANATHAN

 <:;_c;.:r<I13zA EMPLOYEES UNION
».  ..j;# 5-'€32/'40 541%»; amass
  1:1 BLOCK RAJAJINAGAR
"..VE§%NGAL9RE 10

 RESPONDENT

(common IN BOTH
THE PETITIQNS)

4
If

M

-2-

{By Sri: N G PHADKE, AEV )

TI-{ESE WRIT PET1T1oNs*””APE FI_.;_:E1§’._ VUPJDSR

ARFICLES 226 AND 22′? OF THEV=,{3OIS¥.§i§T’iJTiQIVE- O?”-LINEIA

PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER” PP;Sf:’s.E£)., BYg TTHE_V
ADDITIONAL LABOUR _rcQUm:._ = BADIGALQRE mi”.
Ai°PLICA’I’§ON I\EOS.1?/20O1~.v}7i~J}E Ai5~§._1_’€–‘l11_é2_;. ‘NvG’.3/2964′

VIDE ANNEX–M AND ETC.

THESE WRIT PI:,*f}*1wiNG;

= V

file a joint memo
settlement and submit
that éaitcn on record and the carriers

:i1:upugned df Vthaa be modified in terms of the

v j<::i.?it':'«2fl€333?'E1:u,, « ….. .. v

"*_§o:%.I1t memo.

A[‘Ph§3–.is taken can record. The writ pefitions are

fi1i$éif3ring the orders impugned in terms of the

Sd/-

Judge

Ln.