High Court Punjab-Haryana High Court

The Mullanpur Garibdass Coop. … vs Nachhattar Singh And Others on 15 July, 2008

Punjab-Haryana High Court
The Mullanpur Garibdass Coop. … vs Nachhattar Singh And Others on 15 July, 2008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
                     CHANDIGARH.

                               COCP No.1727/2006
                                 in
                               LPA No. 972 of 2002

                                Date of Decision: July 15,2008.


The Mullanpur Garibdass Coop. Choe Reclamation

                                ............. Petitioner

                      Versus


Nachhattar Singh and Others
                                ..............Respondents


CORAM:      HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJENDER JAIN,
            CHIEF JUSTICE
            HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH


1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the
   judgment?
2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?  .
                                 *****

Present: None for the parties.

Vijender Jain,Chief Justice

This petition has been filed under the Contempt of Courts Act

by Mullanpur Garibdass Coop. Choe Reclamation Society praying for

initiation of action against the official and private respondents for violation

of the interim order dated 21.3.2006 passed by this Court in LPA No.972 of

2002.

The matter has been placed before us because of the order dated

12.3.2007 passed by the learned Single Judge ordering the present contempt

petition to be taken up along with LPA No.972 of 2002.

For ready reference, the operative part of the aforesaid order

dated 21.3.2006 is reproduced as under:

                     COCP No.1727/2006 in                              #2#
                     LPA No. 972 of 2002

“In the meanwhile, till further orders, we direct that the
respondents shall not alienate or change the nature of the
property in dispute.”

The present petition has been filed by the petitioners, who were

respondents in LPA No.972 of 2002 and a perusal of order dated 21.3.2006

discloses that the direction was for the petitioner-Society not to alienate or

change the nature of the property in dispute whereas in the present contempt

petition, effort has been made to show that certain government officials and

other residents of the village are lifting sand from the land in dispute and,

therefore violating the interim order dated 21.3.2006 passed by this Court in

LPA No.972 of 2002.

In view of the decision in the main LPA No.972 of 2002, no

further orders are required and, therefore, contempt petition stands disposed

of.


                                             (VIJENDER JAIN)
                                              CHIEF JUSTICE



July 15,2008                                 (JASWANT SINGH)
joshi                                            JUDGE