High Court Karnataka High Court

The National Insurance Co Ltd vs Basamma on 8 April, 2008

Karnataka High Court
The National Insurance Co Ltd vs Basamma on 8 April, 2008
Author: N.K.Patil
IN 'IIHE HIGH COURT OF KARIQATAKPL; BANGALORE
HATED THIS THE 8" DAY OF J-'hPP.II. 2008
BEFORE

THE I-IDN'BLE 2{P.. JUSTICE N.I(.PATIL

Hl!2'.L'WEEN

THE HATIDNAL INEURPLNCE CO LTD
Lil"-3l;$lE.'31~I,-11..L  ER

lE.EE'rIIl.OFE'ICE 3'-1'{IDDI:E TONE STREET

P B Ei'G.§"$£9 KOLFI-'aT'fA "r'Z'L . T'n"1iG'I..T€§'rI
DIVIEIOHRL MANAGER NRTIDNAL INSURANCE
|!3'EJ.I.'I'D..- BIIJKGUI-IDI CDHP'1.EX GEE MINI
"a"IDH1°1.HPs SOUIZIEIP;  _-  I15
REGIUNRL OFFICE 140.144  % GOHPLEX

Pé.a'-".1"Ia".3.'u+;-"=.'I..01-"a.E . . . EE'.1".{."'.E.'I~..»""'HE'.oP.

11331' SM!' : '.33&NC?rEE'1'HFs R LA'I'I'II.?'&_. ADV.)

1 nmmm
we sansmm H;.mEm'~:1'H
man  :5":  we HIL
1*-:.*.n.r.r I-IMIHAL conomr

TIT' "¥'fi'l"'4'l"I'
-H3-Ul'Is1uT|-I

2 c.:1-mm-Imrm. %
we HUDHRYYA Hxnmmwrm
I-EGEB .-'-EBCIUT 32 ms DEC: HDUSEHGLI3 mm

'n-Mm" 'I-'l".'|!§'I.'fl1l'l.'n.'l". 

-£1-|' in ink 1-Jl-fill'!-'III I-bl in-l'\vFuh1 -l-

]! IJAPUR



3 LAKMI mfg RUDRAYYA HIREMETH
EQEE AEQUT 12 YES HTNDF Hwy. 5!

-dc-hV'..r.l.\ .I.\-Gal

flflfiflfihflflh CCU NIL

Effil nnmman fl0'"fiY

BIJAFUR

4 EANQAYYA SIG RUDRAEYA HIREMAIH
EEKD ABGUT H YRS MINOR REP. BY

UH
Lfififififififlfi

RIRT HENMAL COLQNY
EIJAPUR

5 aaanamaaas VA SID RUDREYYA HIREHATH
fiflfifl ABQUT 2 was MIHDR REP. 33
cnammamn
EffiT HEfifiAL coL@fiY
BIJAPUR

:55
IE
'=-=.
' 3
:35
'G
3'1

EADGIRI
GULEARGA DIST ... RESPONDENTS

THEE CIEIE: PETITIflN' I5 EILEE 'U!s.24 93
Gym, PRRYING TD RAN5FER Mvc. 9932005
FEEEING EEFGRE THE MEET, EIJ*'flR Ta THE COURT
0% ERL.CIVIL JUDGE(SR.BIVN.] a can a :MAcT,

BAGALEDT. IN THE INTEREST GE JUSTICE AND
EQUITX=

-I
5
I
I
I

Lnifi CI?IL PETITI"h 6'nI

EHI5 flAYy THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:



0 I D E I
Waugh this mattar :15 listed for non-

nna 4; 4-
uuu; Ab Lfi

IND

nu-J 'I1 "I
Uiiul J..Lufin

hvauard. ami takean up far final dispcusal.

E i In thg 'inn 'I-'maid-' I"'-ix?-I 'I figtitinn the

-I-an-I-or I--h-you-In \G-D-'H'oOn-in an 'Inn;

patiti-one: has sought for trarxafer of ETC
I=i'c:a.E9.:"'2()£"JE'.c panding on the file of the I-IACT,
Bijapmr to the Gaunt of the Principal Civil
Judge acsr. nn..: 5: can a mew, Eagalkot, in the

intmtmat af jutice and equity.

23. Thin: Count an 11.3.2008, has granted

ten days tzime at request, to take necessary

atep. tr: serve nratice an the 1.41"-59.. . evfi.
....._...- .......:.......a...... -N .n..... E' .._....a _-|...._ _.....__..__'1_:___1 1.1 _
.L'§5|E§£.iI 'LlZIIU.8.l1.l.Lt£ .1. LU -Z1 5.1 fl..Lf.'5U PEI! lE'n'.'QC1 EH9

cezxunaaal appaaring fun: the patitiamar to take.

abut rmtiqza ta serve on the czaunsel app-aaring
fur tribe xeapctndenta 1 to 5 before the Trial

emurt. The learned counsel apmmring for the

geetiti ner has -=mhmH*i'¢=--"1 +*1'~a+.: 1*-etice ta the

 



unrserved raapondenta 1 to 5, may be dispensed

with tn the graund that a similar matte: has

PETTIQN ND.15B!200? in the case of saw
NfiTIflNAE INEURANGE CO.fiTD., VS. ILIYAS AND
GTHERS. Tharufwre, the submitted that the

atdar dated 11.2.2008 may be dispensed with.

4. The aubmiaaion made by the learned

aaunsal appearing for tha patitionar as stated

0
-'1
EX!
4!-'
*5}?
ha'
it-'
IE9
I
I3
4:;
9
33
H
IE
I')
0
{EL
1-3
E3'
13
'g
....u
|..I
is
{'1
(I
13
H1

Fl'
flu
F1?'

tha tiak of tha counael appearing for the

patitionet.

. In the light of the submission mafia by

ill!

the learned counsel appearing for the
patitianar and as the suhjact matter involved

in thmse cases are direatly cevered by thfi GP
I~T::-.1E.5Br'2I(Z!II'4'? disposed of on 13.2.2fl08 in the

aa-e cf Ratianal Insuzanc Cc.Ltnd., ¥s.

/.__.____.



Iliyaw and others,

. " ' Wu
aadexr tha

be diamiaewd.

mrderad accordingly.

91*

and ffiliawiwg the

, . .
'1
instant Glv1¢

0-
Int.
U!
1...:
Eu
4...:
ED

..

Patitxar

-5 tilted;

as devaid of merits.

sci!-~

‘judge