INT?HEHKfiiCOBRT{N?KARNATAKA,BANGALQRE
DATE?) THES THE 29%: DAY 0;’ JANUARY, 2009
PRESENT
THE HQNBLE MR. JUSTECE K.SREED}i;%4’E§.:§$?.é§{§::: T ‘
AND j Q
THE HONBLE MR. .3UST1CE%4s§i§e*.V.%SAj*YmI;z12;a3fs§;~zA
M.F.A.NO;”:”%1T2i’2Qi:;3 té’+zi’€;*; _
BETWEEN
THE NATEQNAL’E?aF.SU.R2%NCE._{3{} L’–i””£}..V .
No.10, om PARK }K_’,(}A.IZ;”:» jj .
INMJRE,:v§AHARA’32=::;fRa.,_” ”
REP BY THEIR’ ;:2§MzN’;isTRjp.fr’:vE OF’F’ICER
REGIONAL O.F’PT’IC{«3V,’1%«{1’GR7€}A’£> ‘ –
BANGALORE .
, .. &.PPELLAN’i’
” (BY isR_§”s’ s1é[*~.sHAiLA, ADVOCATE)
3; : -Jjc: A§=;:Vr§’;A;sx§2″-Aim?
1 sm LATE CH¥NNARi(}{){}NBER
“2’~\(}E.,’i)’:%fE}(}U’F 53 YEARS
_ RA;m§1:xr£A P
V. ‘ 33.5/{> ?ERiASWAMY
* –.Af;§E}:) ABOUT 47 YEARS
SMT. MANJSLA
WI 0 BALASUBRAMANYAM
AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS
F’
W
dvependeoeiz would be Rs.9,18,000/– ( Re.4500
;:.ri¢,o1.i¢;s.. (months) x 17 (multiplier). The widow is
it petitioziers together entitled for Rs.25,000 towards loss
0 “‘V.Vof’expectancy, Rs.10,000 towards funeral expenses. Irm.%*_
0’ ‘ “the petitioners are entitled for Rs.9,78,000 as against
appeal chaflenging the quantum of as
excessive. The deceased is a partner
firm. The audited statement 0 eeeoiints 04
show that the income of deoetesed .”wa’s.’
123.2, 13,000 p.a. stated that the
income of the to 12,000. The
Tribunal Rs. 10,000 which
is on of proof of avocation
andis at Rs.5000 p.m.. M:
is to dediieted personal expenses. Rs 4500
wo;11id…enuxre ‘v?I)€.i’1€fit of the dependants. The total
eiititled Rs.25,000 towards loss of consortium, the
4—-~”‘
Rs. 13,86,000/-. The interest payabie on the
cempensation would be 6% p.a. fiom the date of petition
in
till the date of payment. 2/ 3 of the compensafié}3*g.::s7}1afl
be paid to third petitioner and 1 / 3 of
shall be shared by petitioners-:I”‘amd ‘ j z
Judge