High Court Karnataka High Court

The National Insurance Co Ltd vs Iliyas S/O Adbulrajak Magi on 8 April, 2008

Karnataka High Court
The National Insurance Co Ltd vs Iliyas S/O Adbulrajak Magi on 8 April, 2008
Author: N.K.Patil
IN THE HIGH COURT or KARHATAKB; BANGALORE ' 

mamas THIS THE 6" DAY an APRIL

"l"I'_'l"B"
..|.

£1.53

1L'l'f""L .1' I'
.c.'n..«r.I.'Ir

CIVTL PETITION HQ.159f2aD7 _£;f"'

BETWEEN

F

.' i_'

THE NATIGNAL IN$UBfiN$E_¢G,hTD_
nxvzsxonam fiANnG%a ._
EEGD»UFFICE 3--MIppLE TQHE=BTREET-

P B mn.9229wKoLEATrA;1i,;_THmQUGH
DI?I3IQHAL'MfiNnGER mmTIQNAL-1NsunAncE
co.Lrn,;*3ILAGUmn;'sompLEx 999 MINI
vIDfiAHaVs¢UflHA»G¢3£aRG£ g THRGUGH ITS
EEG:mnAL,oFE:cE;No;1¢4-5UaHnnAM COMPLEX

EfifiGfil0HE  Hi' PETITIDNER

-:B&:=$1s:':  R LMHIA, Anv.)

t

-gr:-o-on _ -I.|-u-nan. .. ..

_¢ifiS fiffi=mfffiLn&uaK.fifiGI
A'afiEfl=mAquT 39 YRS
 »m¢c,mEnImAL ausrumss snap
%,n;A¢»pn A,fi,MAGl gens; nag;

u=.3AnI'E3M&N BIJAPUR

fimghmmflb YUNUS
A :3;-*G,_;.'--'LIJBIII.PtAJi5sK me:
"A$£n ABOUT 35 was

'< 96 BUSINESS

'I-.'!'E"D

dc' fiiilififi

1'.Il'h!1"'..'1' Ufi TKEET
Iuldll

Ivh'K"l-Md-all» Ilnlhnflullf

P:!L5.T DR .1%..15.
BRDI HA1'.-IPLN EIJAPUR



um

ILJ1

naagmngg xgaagzn
afo ADBULRAJEfi HAGI

-II 1-urn-I-. -n H. .a-.1--rg-I1 -"\l'|| -urn-1 f'I
£"u'«.:|'£e.1J 3".L.l'JU'J J. 5-J ]'..l1'L3'D

use BUSINESS RfiAT nn .A.AmmeI HOUSE h }§ f ',

BADI KAEIRN BIJAPTJR 

I-{AI-I:'13I-iJ'JD I883'-LK   

r.'1.H's "."l.'I"\'l::1'T'l"'l.':'i'I.}'l"1'l.'I'.( u":-Lrrr
uilfl U .f1a.l...'J'.':lI..l&¢l-&"..fll..l.¢'lu-l'\ J.'¢Il"ln\2T..l..

FIJSEIII ABOUT 32 YES

on: BUSINESS afar DR A.A.flh I HDU5E «' f 

IQERF. E-ADI K.i3sHAI'I EIJAEIIF'.~..V_

E.3%..HIl'"£A L1!" A.1:w_r__.z2..:=~.-.:T==~..i..,...§;:.:-I4...  
REED ABGUT 3 YES ""c H '5EHDLD wean
EJAT ma .A.a.aa*x*1r"sa F *"* "'"'"

  3&4
BIJAPUR ' *~ -' -

mmnnmnnngifigfin Ere AbEu£R§JAx5MneI
fifififl ABUUE 24 235 Oct STUDENT
afar ma .aga.HaG;a§'EsE EERR BRDI

azqayug';

vsnu--.Iu.-r
J.\."Il.".I-l'I.lV

Ju3EnA'nJb*§a§U1R$JAK'HA9:
REED fiBOUT,20jER5 GEE HOUSEHOLD wean
EJAE mg -s.a.ma$1 amass Nfififi aanz Kan;

azaayun', 'V5

Z

1

F

fE%fiflMm,HHS5EIN 3/o ADBULRAJAK MHGI

g~AGEu-Aaouw an was can STUDENT

-.'.mrA@anK';A;A=MmGI
'; BIJ&FflE ;

._ ...tZlUSE 

..I..'JI

,. __.fi_I.'«J

k 973 ffiAvELs THROUG ITS
9EflE"K v SHIVAJI AGE MAJUR

'*:3Au5ponm BUSINESS afar BALAJI NAGAR

   

V V'-._'H-'EDGIRI GULEARGA DIST

THE IQNRGING DIRECTOR

..R..T.l7 K.H.F.C1EI7
.3 NfiGAR BIRNIBAIJIJRE . . .

" H
Um

REBPONDEITIS



{BY SR1 5HfiRANA§PA HUTTUR E N B KBSAR J

THEE UIVIL PETITIQN FILED U/$.24 QF~C§¢}§ .
RRAYIHG 'TD 'TRANSFER. mvc. zaexzoos grzNnxnG_"e*

BEEDEE :5; mast; BIJAEUR TD THE_MGQflRT;"QE
PnL.cIvIL JUneEzsR.nIvH.) e -can: "{EACT;.'
BAEALRET, IR was Iuraassw:iaEw £fiéT*cEf<A§b}

EQUITY.

THIS CIVIL PETITIGN cfinine as Eda fiEBER§
rnxs DAY, THE couar MADE THE_FDLLDWING: =

u:Egg_pwnx"

an-ninja'.

'II'ho1.1gl"L this I'fl5.t$.'-V;BfT.If~._   for non---

camplianaa cf"fihQ o:der dgfi@§*ii¢E,2QDS

.'.In' the »in$£a§x; Civil Petition tha

f-3

h-.......m= 3:'-..u.ghf.:' fa: transfer at 1#1"€C

=»}f".€.

Q-I
r-r
i.-..
r;
u

1'.-.1--'
Tlfi

'I3

9*...

I: i3'I:3 fie"1'1di;'_1.g.vc~n the file of the 14IACT;

_ '£2
.- {3-

id.

 Court -ME the Principal Civil

**, V auagévisijffifiyi a can a nanw. Bagalkot. in the

 interéé-atV"'.pf"justice and equity.

 'I'his Court on 11.2.2008, has granted

 V':'vt«:511Er:fiaya time at request, to taka neceasary

Btapm to serve notice can the un-sarvad

/

/m

/ ?___.__.



H
E!
ii
'I'!
<3
L
ID.
«:11
1::
I1"
3
it
*9
is
]3
SD.
{M
1.

..!
ll!
ID
’13
114
I
2
‘.1-

<1-

4,
1!:

S3.

11′
3

-:3
<3
0
1:

:3
‘ . ll
A.-“‘1!
. H

’11

1’1?

if

ml
9::

£1.

fli
‘-5 ..

.*’:’.’

LE
t’1h

3|
Q1

,6.

flu
til’
1.4..

11%’

9.”.

Q:

u
all
I1:

r1r
El
(‘1?

nrativrm to same on the c:.o’unael appea2:4’ing.:&T:f’5r~

tlm 7;-vaspa-rxdent No.9 before

The ln-earned counsel ampé’a::i.i1g’T’

1’_.’i€|titj.’311″.Lfir has 3ubmittaci._v:t-1-tat A’11Qti¢f.-év-V_

.:.r1-!.e.=e….-ad Ieapcrdanta. , 1.2.5″
with am the gruurtd ‘matter has
been ciieapca-.s.¢’_d..i:fi+,f “in CIVIL
PETTIHN ‘V”:t;se of THE
Amwrwemfi ~~~~ vs. ILIYAS Amt:
tub-mitted that the

.n.’r-fle¢’r- 1:1-#2.}-‘1. ‘1 ‘I ‘3’ ‘PQHR, I;PV..¢|’EJ’ 1–an HH n.-manna/4| 3.741-1-1
\-fl’rlu5J-V?nI- 9-Ila: D $ 9. K W’¢’ ET 5-fiiDPPI&E€\§ I’I’4- Elfil

aubtfii’é£éian made by the learned

” dated 11.91.2008 is dispensed with at

of the ccisunsal appearing for true

% Vpattitiuner .. /

At

/—=–t~*

5. In the light of tha submissicn m”da_yy

the learned caunsal agpaaxing for f”the .

pmtitioner and as the subject matter ifirgi§§d;x’

in theaa cases are directly cavaxgd by tha”CE_

Ncn.1.£iBx’20II37 dispoaed csf on

aaae af Natianal Insufififiaa ACo,Lt£d.} “VS;

– .. 3*. – v3…..:.:
Ilxyaa and uthe:s,, and «£%ilGw;”g aha =va¢u

be diamiasad. _ Vw

=.a”.:.r the fli:-“1″c7e.1”:’?§e«:::{‘,. this Givil
Patitimfi i3″Vaigfii3aéd_ as– dav¢id at merits.

Ozderad ac;¢:din§iy}ryi””

” .Ié3;»=*_ T