High Court Karnataka High Court

The New India Assurance Co Ltd vs Sangappa on 29 November, 2010

Karnataka High Court
The New India Assurance Co Ltd vs Sangappa on 29 November, 2010
Author: L.Narayana Swamy


35%;; X5, 31?’}’?°§%3 3&5?)

E51′ TEE EKGEE $Q{..?R’§’ {T}? §{.§RE~§A’§’&§% 5.’? B.§.1’¥G&I.«Q2~f?.tET

M7533 ‘1’:-£15 13$ 2% 39;? Q? mxrgzawaa, %

BE FQRE

firm §-immm gm msfica L ,

“E’h:s Raw inafifia Amura.:1<?;;ci'*~€;3a {L'{.;cL; –.
fiivigiazial Gfiae, Shimagéé "

Thrsmgh §egiQr3.aEAQ&$e_… ‘

F. Kaliaga Rafi §f3§’3;{§3;&=53. I
Baagaieyas — 2?’; _ .

By dzfiy mzz$’?£€1z_,{c§” “31;:%£s:Q:*:f:;:§§”* ”

5 . ésgxgaélaxét

gay: 32-1. 19:; g&s;:;;

” …..

V : $,g’Va::.V§§~fi§iR,E**3§f§*eZ%1__f:%e”a:,z*$$wa;
‘ ..g1%.g:5.s5}:’a;h2:§§;;:§: ;_’E§ yfiam
* Afiiia ‘%’ic§;§*«a.3;2zaga:*; it §?§.§”ifi§Z!:
E}_;§a’a{a:’3_.§ f;’~:’-.ihémsg& Cifw

1 §§_m§:;=?”x§’i§aya K’ may

Eiaiafi; Esfigtraagg Zviwdma.

K

% % – % .m.–»m—W :3’=–«—–.–3__%”;”%’ °3′

zsgzs. 15%. 33752993 gm:

fimsxy 3C:3f1$$}3 5%: Mam
Bagavmzagudi, Shimaga

€83′: Srig GE’ fiazrishgnkm ,Adv; £32: R2) L.

. . , R&g§:3m§;§:?;%:§§_ L” , ”

This htiimellaneaua Fimt
sectian 233:1} ef MV Act a.g&_ir1s’§:’Vt}ie:V_j11a1g:m¢:?:%: a:.€1f£i% ”

awaré; éated 31.923993 pas~’3ee'<i._i12 NG'..%'?§_§5f
an tbs flit ef {ha I} Adélk gigzfigé {€;r.I3:1.3
Eégtar éggzcidsnts Glaims, 'E'r$1;..:za§t,..Se'h§m&g7é:fe;,..a;wiarciing

9. cemfiafisazian sf Rg;9€3=.,QQ7fi[–, ‘w;t?z3;’~~i:1t¢:r::st at §%
FA fmm thc flaw af’ pe?.i’:§;@;3:3. i.§,2§’:*»:f§:sli:z;;g§iasz:;

Thg fss:;;*’~V:’;?;dVm$i:§’:§’§’.’m*: tézis day;
tha cans”: d;e§i*a§§éf;eé;f-£1153 .fi31§:;feé§§g: 1. V ”

%¢§§$3Exr

‘a§peif.1a:§_5: i’::.&§§;ra.:*;ca =§§§{2§§31§? ig ghailfinging

%k::§a awm aagaa m,a§.29{§$ gaggagi ix:

V ‘fig :%:§ ‘§”fi§u::g.£ mg tha gmuxgfi; $§

Qgzxafitzgfim . V

A’ _

” ” Ejfhe $313 geurzé aka: by €233 aggaliarxi»-

ég £2′: rcfaai; af than cemgarzsatimsz

3%’; 2%. sivmam gravy

awsréaé iemrds pain aim sggffegéng aa §s.’2’Q,f}f;3′:T3.f«~

Tim Tfibuzzaé hag cesmmittefi an army in ”

said amaamt Withaut examinizzg tha $.’_£ts¥i

asce aw matariaia §red::§;a§d §:h.§f:%*é::’;

3. In geapact sf {ha giibmigfliéfifi itéfi. :§cé:3.’}§£i% ‘

tin:-5 Grfiar 222.3%; fiat: ts {Em asc.%§’:’75é§_i§1f’1:’;;;:’.:%f€;1′:vic>:$’¢r has
sustairmd grievous i2x§ui%§«%__ immgfiiatfily
shfiad ‘ta: ika ficecrding

is tha déigtw’ him has mated that

the pe§i§icm§i1&Lr4.%h:§§ sisggtazaifizz $22 his right

gifia lféaaimirfis 9&5′ iefl 4&1 amé 3&3: ribs and

!§§.§{2t: Zthg Tribunal ha axaminszi E3; F4 §

‘2a%§€;:3£§,j’..éart§fi¢ata ififiéifiii by the E%&§ $3531: Eémpitai

ljjféghicéfx dissiases that §E’€§i§$§i§$§’ hfifi augtaizsssé;

\?

1
\

3&3 2%.. $’i’?’?2§§@ §§eéiV:§

cantusiafi an his fight siéa skuii am fmeturt: cafiegft

$3} xxd Sm rim 321$ athgr itijzzrieg asskzigh m*{::””g:’i¢i_zz;_ic{:s;_av ‘_ _

ix; riatura Ggnsidemfi ai}. thes$ a.s§s$€:;z:; » .}’§Z§:;ij$”~w1:::;e;;;}.*at ‘ ‘v

aiso feeis thai csmyazzaatian aW$;;*d§”dé..Ezy:5t}1:a’

‘ztawaxfifi gain afid aizflémg §ig:h.:?szf éa fiat L’

a gmé reasan is i:z1te1ffEre’i:h_.e azzié
amxfi gaasad &»y it} iiégia aituatifin.

Acccsrziéngiy «

é. dismifisead at éhé stagg

ef adm§$$§§£;’:a..§§$fi§§, ._ 2 ”
S?» » _”‘§’§1§ sa;m:aé.;.2§.§ fir: éagagii %$ iraxmmitieé ta;

2 §*€£¢:€’;3£?L’;t’%aé;v§.f;§:»2;z°:f:,§ mama Tfifiziagi #Eii§i”i&€§”i’i§fig

8&2?

JUDGE