l
in “ms HIG-H mum on xannxmcn AT
DATED THIS THE” 17%: DAY OF f
BEFORE
THE HUMBLE MR.Jus’£f;cE. é T– T ?
M:s.£J.>”c}q:.s$2.;)»:-.’Rc)A::)»
BANGALOKE-.56ia.o2’r– » ‘
REP 32 ITS .; V A AFPELLANT
(BY SR! Puxsuyéagsu,’ my
A %%%%%
LA 1:.’ ‘ §&;ami1~.NAYAxA@MANauNATH
T. s,{0».xALA..NAYAK
A ‘*2s”YRs._R/0 BERAKANAHALLI VILLACrE
VATEF. .3012. POT, PALYA HOBLJ
mama TALUK
.. HASSAN DISTRICT
fésxuuaa
S/O M.’i’.SOMEGOWDA
MAJOR, R/0 M.H.FURA VILLAGE
SING-EHGON.I)ANAHALI..i POST
AALURU TALUK
HASSAN DISFRICP. RESPONBENFS
I
“””” ”””””” W
THIS APPEAL is FILED UNDER sscmon 30(1) 0? we AC1′
AGAINST THE suoaumur & 0299.12 DATED 10–4-2007958830
m WCA/NF/SR.NO.’78/05 or: THE ms 0;? THEN maoua
OFFICER 85 commxsszonm FOR womausu COMPENSATEQN,
HASSAN SUB–DIVISION, HASSAN AWARDING A CO’iuEJ¥?!$}f§!i§_!13;T}_0N
OF RS.96,87’6/- WITH INTERES’I’@ 12% RA.
THIS APPEAL comma on: FOR AD:e:is3zé}s”.’i*i§1s.VuAi'{‘;”.
THE COURT DELIVERED THE F’OLL’g)WING:’_
JUnGM§gf
me agpcnmt beans’ ia:_1}§;c
come up with this and
award passed by _ for Worlrmc-.n’s
Comia;:n:;a£j:;§5n”u’.ii:-.i ‘E~Ef:$;~.:}}a’€fi/’NF/SR.NO.78/05 darted 10-4-
” 2 otmtcndcd that appc%t hm issued
‘V cover the risk of 6 labo- uncrs plus 1 dnver” ,
claim petitions cams: to be filcd and
alrcady satisfied five awards.
a The rcspondcnt–1 is the Ioadcr. He sustained’
in the motor vthiclc accident and the appclhnt has
A Enot disputed the relationship (if cmpbycr md employee and
the injuries ausiained by mspondcnt-1 timing the cxmrsc of
– 4
employment. According to: rcspotidcnt-I ,
gricvous injurics in the motor which ivv’.*ia.<_x
dmwm' g an income of Rs.4,ooo;';}i:r«ia¢;niii or 7 V
R350] «-.
4. The wound ccrtili .. . ‘
fiacturc of nasal of nasal
rm.-., am: at a lie developed
synus getting the iota}
disability __.-Of ‘I’akm- the nature of
work of the i’x1:spotiirVlv¢ii1¥”$:’l has rightly
taken the th; Rs.3,000/- per month
aZ£ll4’:1_ haS Jgiisabifity. Therefore, I do not
order gacd by thc ‘ ‘ car
V V
‘ ° L 5. A ‘€.1’cg£|1′(. ‘ i,={:;:ic liability rasicmd on the appellant is
‘ H thfi appellant is the insurer of the
which met with an accident and under
the risk of the insurer-appellant is mined to 6
V. ” and one dnvc’ r and in whole, ugh’ t claim’ petitions
in
cf ” ” “-
_
came to he saw and um appellant hm
awaxd passed in respect of ‘
award in respect of one __
without any gnuzlds 33¢ its liability
to satisfy the award pefition- As
such, them méga Co2nmms1o1:’ ‘ :1’
in fixing satisijr the award.
Hcncg;,_ at the stage of
* ‘