MFA N:3.IDG93.?Z(}{3?
IR THE man COURT 0? KARKATAJQX' « . ; _
CIRCUIT BEHCH M nganww» ; %
DATED THIS THE 29% nA§*%%4orf%%%Jtrr%L:,$% 2009
Pm-333*'?
THE Hoz~r*nLE M.R.Ji3$'.1'ICE$
TEE 1~IoH*BLg
~;§§'_;;.,,k;;oo93/2097 mvi
Betwee}£' a
mg COMPANY LIMETEE
N.C.M.,HUBLI - % * L *
BY 1TsaANc3AL0§£~: RECQGNAL OFFICE',
2%, WETY BU£§_3:_)ING«- ANNEXE, P. KALINGA
' " RAG'-i}§:O.!;LD, V.{MISSIG--E*$ ROAD), BANGALQRE-2'?'
R733 _}:3Y_1?fS';._L'}~1?;PLI'E'Y MANAGER. APPELLANT
¢nyA*s;a;Rg"¢1cégsamamt, Adv)
' _VAnd;.. .
M' * : SM?' SASALB\§GAMM;%
. W;;'Q SKI EvEALL§KAR.fiJE\E MENAS§§'§&§{AYI
AGE{) ABQUT m YEARS
% ace: HQLESEHGLD WORK
A %;*2. SW SAVITI-{A
W/' 0 SR} LINGARAJU MENASINAKAYE
AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS
MP2": ';"~§ea1€)§€?3.s'2Gfi7
OCC: HQUSEHOLC} WORK
3, KUM MEGHA -
fl/C) SRILINGARAJU MENAS§NA}{?:'§E -I' = V
AGED ABQi3'I'}.3 YEARS,
OCC: STEJDENT %
4' KUM VARSE-IA *
I3/O SR1 LINGARAJIF MEN....S:NA1§Ay3 L
AGEDABOUT1GY.E§ARS," --« V
00:3: STUfiENT ' ' - V
5. RUM sowM§5fiA._. % _ %
mo SEE L;_N<.':;:s3e;s.J:}: Er1ENASINAE{,AYI
AGED A}3{3s'!Z,3T.I':
OCC: NI1,__ --f__
é, KUM NEI?§Eivj'ET3[V§:}S§¥,:V'};fi5:*¥'€}2€sf€A;J{} MENASINAEQAYE
mm: 530%}? 3V;T24A¥§:;;Rs,
£330: 2%}; _
Mzimgs uéma' F85?' '§;¥--£EER MOTHER ANB B€§%.TEIRfi;L
{}§;;5AR§3?$N 2NE.¥...RE3SPGNDEN'F
A . ALL_ i"*3;:'Ai3: <§.%~'iI'§.G¥PETE§
_ cm) "Eii;?8L-L; A HULBLI
:2: szmsmgiéafiamgs samg
S /0 S91, SYEESAB EARAN'%fAfi;LE
ufi%é3E§)'MAJOR
_@w,NER $1? Loam' 2% AP-2 2/2424
1t%;*<3 ASARAMQHALLA
" §Z'<IE,;fi;R Jms BASTHE
' QLD HUBLL HUBLE R.ESPQNBE}'¥TS
A {By S3:-i.G.Krishna hitxrthyz, adv for m :9 R5;
MF13: N0.1€}093!2§fi?
3
This appeal is filed under Se{:t.i01:1 373 (1) of My Act
against the judgment and award dated 21,€")4.2('}O'? gassed
5.1:: M.V.C.N0. 19/ 2093 en the fiie sf Pyle Civil J udge4j{i%1€:}7}i3, )
and Adam. MACE', Hubfi, awarding a eempez'x3a;i0_:t1~i' 917.
R$.6,40,0G0/ ~ with the interest at the rate of .8% f:r;)11i"thee
date of petiiicvn 'tiifl depesit. e .
This appeal Coming 0:13 foe a§fi:i£:3$§e:Qfi,,.'
I:}¢V.Sh}'1€I1dI7a K11mar.J., delivered1il1e<i25§iewi:1g;--._ _ "
JI}DGBi1§;I§;L'
1.
This appeal is by z-flee I13.3’u;:%;1ee-»_§3em:13a;nyVA”%:vhe had
provided i11sL:ranee eevef .e_i:”1 femrehiele bearing
regstration ene Mohaznmed
Saciiq vfiéieh in the aeeidezlt 1’esI.11t§ng if:
::ieat.h :}f {we LiI”igar;13″‘1:«~~l’s!Ie11asi:3.akayi wilereuptzm the
‘.:iepe:§e%a§1§’e pf V Lingaraju base Eerozigm a eiaim
Tbef£:»rEee -1~”‘}:°i11ei§a} em: Jufige (811311), am Add},
M.25g,C;T., in Es»1.V.C.E\¥e. :9; 2093 whieh was aileweé
‘Qjaanfiiyivfig the eompezieatieri gagabie ‘:9 {he eiaiments at
Rs.6§49,€i}QQf=- am} aeeeeiing the vereien ef the
iézsguraflee C,empa13§.–* {hat the dyiver ef the vehicle did get
_4 jhaaze 3. valizi fieerzse at the time of eatjzeing the aeeiden: as
the vaéjidity perieii was ever am} tE2e:’efe3.’e exeneraiesi the
§/
¥s’EF§ EEO, ?;{}{)§3f’2G€}’?
4
Insumrzse Company from the liability but navsrthéless
diracted the Insxlranca Company to first make
awarci ané than in claim reimburse-max}: f1:’0111 ~fh€ V0sr§fI1£:’1″::. _””T “
2. It is zmiy against this part
Ifisuramte Company shouid }i1I:§t L.
than Sfifik reixnbursement _ 0i?i?VI;1.€:fi”«_VV:ifS;”:i-‘:ll%%’;f;’: by the
Tribunal the presant ‘ ‘ R
3. The ” 3:, ‘i.*?hi;’,i’1. iia’svv..:3;§t11aii}r exonerated the
Ensuranéa {Q’4311:pié:zijg frQ%i13__ ‘i.*;_-_s “liability, has Heveflheless
haviizg ‘regfirszézzcs of Section 14? Qf the Meter
“V§hi=éJ§:s ;f.fi_§@£..%_a11dA’ {ha—Eiabfiity on the gar’: Qiif the insurance
avoided undm” farsuitieus ciremfistanceg,
thébi ,_;$Vi:101;fI.v;dE’v’L: wark 011?: $3 the {aria} detriment 0f the
directad thg Insurance Campany ta frst maka
award ammmt ané than ta: aiaim E’€iifi1§3i3I’$€BZ1€}i1fZ
.VVf’:%{}:’¥:§.E} film awnerx.
V,
MFA N0. i@fi’§3:’20G7
4. 11:1 zmr View, a directian of this naturs is e::g.*:1E§%
serve the object 01′ Secticr 14′? and on eqzxitabie.Vv§§iff§I1fi:i;;:€1e 9
and does not warrant iriterferencefiforifipsétifiiiig’£1913<s§{1f;.:::i'
in an apgeal prasanted by the»ix'3,$1;.rai1<;fa"€3o1n:p'é§:';1§$f_ . .
5. Though learneci :4 would
contend that even on {:§;)11i;’per:sa{io11, the
Insurance ;::oz1teI1ding that
the azneunt afraid we cannot
entertaizyiy reason that the
iiability Efisurance ilcrmpany and the
directicn is 33313,? téfacii. aé. an agexfi ef the Qwuer to first
pa§y:si1;entA:§ifiC1V than to seek reimbursement fmm
tile 0;:1?I”i<3:}'.'* 'V 9'
fr'0;rV"'t§1é'ab0ve reasan, we (10 119': admit this appeal
$2-amiss the appea} at firm stage of aiimissiorz.
VT The 331101111: in ciapczsit: 'wafers '£1133 {hurt ha
3 '4 A' trarwmitteé ta {ha Tzibmml and the Etxsurance Campany
$1/%
MFA N(;~.§Q§93i2Gi}'3
{<3 deposit, the bafiance amount wittl i:m;erest_
weeks from the date of receipt of 3. copy of V' »
.3111]-