The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs Raghu Poojari on 14 October, 2008

IN TEE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT' BANGALOfRE 

DATED THIS THE 14TH my 0? OCTOBER 2'9;:j 3T f %.

3E¥*'ORE

THE HGNBLE MR.Jus'r1r;:E:''N;A1§;;NnAf l. ':  

M. RA. N03 12?! 205:3 

BETWEEN:  _

The Oriental Insurance 00-  ~. 
Chickamagalur ' .. ~ 5 ..  2. V '
By its Ragiczmai Office      
No.44-45, Leo Shopping  1V  V

Residency Road,Baz1galc§I"e "  _   ~ 
Rep. by its      

(By Sri P.B.Ra_iu"a§ Ass6éiats¢s,.'_}xd§qgaies)

AND:
1.
   ..... 

Sari Emu P<$0J'aIi"

‘ Maamkem Estate

~–. Ka1asa.Pc.st-5:r.7_..~1 24

P9’!oG:iigc:rc:–

Chickagnazgajiur District.

The Manager
.. fiavinkeze Estate
* i30st=-5?’? 224
_V Moodigcre Taluk
% Chicictnagaiur Eistrict.

. . . Respondents

(Bjk S3’iyutb’s K.M.Nataraj, Advocate far R1; ‘I’.Ra3″aram «Ea
VG.R.S11jat}1a,_. Advocates for R2)

RS130/– per day. ‘§’hercf0re, I do not fiild any ermr in

determination of income of claimant.

9. In View of above: discussion, I do not fifi61v.f’a;iy_4

grounds to infcrfexrr with the impugned order. : V’

appeal is dismissed.

1 ffudgé” k

SNN