High Court Karnataka High Court

The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs S Chandrappa on 25 March, 2009

Karnataka High Court
The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs S Chandrappa on 25 March, 2009
Author: Lok Adalath
   Arum P011 appa, Advocate)

HIGH mum wmx. asxvzcns commirmgf    ,
mmeanonm   V' A
BEFORE THE LGK ADALAT % _ _ .A 
IN THE awn coum' or mxnarggiigigaf nmeg;g,;m  
mans Tms THE 25% DAY 0:? _ V X
G0Nc:L1ATzoR:3TV_:r3;-Esfiiwir V':  A 1'
THE H{}N'BLE MR.JuSf"z€_i: xggmarfiwfi M

SR} R :I.Ai3'éa;'VMEAM.BE.R  l = 

MiscELLA§§{::;:'s §5E. RS5§""APF'E;Xi; 'N.r1...T8138/ 2006

€.'z{{}I*§4_"2§;I3§i'LA'l%"§~§.£'}A s::{;«" QSES/2008

Biavrwfifigfig { " - 1 F

1 The Qflcntal ~»{3<3.Ltd
Bra3:1cii1'Ofi3sce:" ' . %V
T43.P.C.'M.g::,:::t§mp1ex*~"

, lf{..M;'Road, 'C§hiKQm§1ga1uI
v . "  #mp.resen1;e<i"i3y its
 Ra§;5m:}a1€31'fice
" _ Le:c'~a:fonipi_cx.
.  .Reéid€_:nCy 'Rt§ad Cross
'  Bangaloteéfiéfl 0:25
4' {1:'e1::.r[ by 51:3 Asst.Ma.::1agcr
K*~Ja§;mam} ..Appe1}a11t .

£9"

 



  £40.53/2G(}2j_ oi: the file': of the Civil Judge (Sz'.D11) 515
 Mcjuaberfi.  Kaiiur awarding a compensation of
_figs.3.,6?,26:2j--}_wit11 interest @ 8°/In pa. from the date of

" " fyéiéticn  pamcnt.

 ~-!'_s__é;a;§latQ,gth& fofiowing order isgnassedsz

1 S Chandmppa, major

S/0 Shivappa   
Jr.Engi1:1ec1* 
K.P.T'.C.L.

Rfo K.E.B.Quartcrs

Mathighatta

Kadur Taluk

Chikamagalur Dist,

2 Abdu} Khadar, major
S/oAhme<:1  __ 1 _ _ _
D1iverofAutGiic3x?s1iaW::--. =i   A V  = 
RI 3 Nazca: Seth Elxtgnsim;   * "

Karim? Towh .:'   

3 Hajarath, mv?-51%? .
Sfo Khatiaxf  4' _  
R/aTh§*agaraiafia'£8jr_  
Kadur Team * "  »-- ' ...Re.spo11dentS
(By Sri D". Jaagadteéiéwfidv fur R-- 1
 3    ..... 

L'   "filed under Sanction 333(1) of MV Act
aga§1ii3.t'fl1<é. judgmfixfiénd award dated 36-8-20{}5 passed, £31

 , " 'A.T%zis.."' appcal, ceming on for ooncmaufm; baforc the Look

/3

 



._ 3 ,_,,,
CONCILIATION ORDER
The learned advocates for both parties are present.

2. The matter is settled between the parties,  the

joint memo dated 25-3-2009, wherein the Respondent..'f§lo:l'ii:..Vha.s

agreed to receive and the appellant –y,}Vnsurar1c:e–: has

agreed to pay a sum of Rs. 1,130,000/l’+,,

Thousand only) with intere’s_t”‘–~._at ‘A86/lo iw».i._’in.ste3adi

Rs.1,67,262/– yvith interest at….lllS”/o”‘p.a..lavyiarded by the

Tribunal, in full and final

3. The appe1_1;;1?g;,.,-.’,. has agreed to
deposit the ‘before: the within six weeks
from the Cl.,ate_ hp-.’reparati,o’ii,.._Qf award, failing which the said

amount rate of 9% p.a. from the date

of default, “till the ‘datellof deposit.

sum, 50% of the amount shall be kept in

h”-~”‘fixedlid.epos.itl:ii1’l:the name of the Respondent No.1 in any

” ifriationalizevdi’Bank for a period of three years with liberty to

§’*==~;{. §;~–{j::.”T_ §’

H

draw the interest on the said amount. The baiancc 50%; of I
é~*~r*€’_’t? rwé %
the ammmt shai} be released in favcmr of the H

5. Both the parfits are settled the claim’ ‘

above the tzcmpcnsation awarcieci by t1.ttn*?’,~V’I’:I7i’1)11.:r’1.:V._a”1′, ‘ ~:

5. We are satisfitfi’ ‘a.hoi;1~_V _of settlement

Itzpertxrtd by both f£f;:=:__ paztfléé’ arrived are

just and 4′ ‘ ”

7. djsposcd of in terms of the joint

memo. The: “awa:d E,-pf’ fig-.’:%V’*1′:¥ibuna1 shall stand modified

– V _ _
acggxdfmgly. z’é”é*°’=~*é3- ‘g”””””°*’*”*”

” . _ “i.”3rair_%a% 11 pnthc award accordingly.