IN THE HIGH comm' or KARNATAKA, BANGA1oRE_ DATED THIS THE 1 1*"! am: OF APRIL : :' . BEFORE %& k V THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICEVA. s 3
wserr PETITION NO.14717 0F X
BETWEEN T’ L’ E X
THE OFHENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITEE. _
HOSPET, REP BY THEIR &.DMINES’l’RA_’FIVE_
omega, REGIONAL GFE_’!C’–E, M Q–ROA.m
BANGALORE. ” AA _ PE’I’I’i’lONiL’.R
(BY SE1 5 salszwm, Arm’ ” % I’; V
AND :
1 SHEi§ES’i?E?QHXR’ ..
THE MOTOR -if-»f’EI+Ii{L.’¢I;ES enema ‘m:BuNAL
MD on’: J’U£)€}E4V(SR___DN)_*, KOPPAL.
2 a?AM&NAPPA’$jb;c3&fAmaPPA
AGED ABOBT 35 ‘s’Efi;RS
_ 1g/o S£I)L’JAPLlR,’TA1;UK;KUSHTAGI.
‘ s§;A;g1KA1éAPP.A.. .@ SHANKAR
_ i£¥A.¥OR_S[0.YAMANAPPA
g;o.’r;AmxAG:Rs.
£0
2 K DINESH
A . TS/CLESHAPPA KADI
1?] 0′.vKANAKAGiRI
~~ RE’I’IRED TEACHER. RES?’ONDEN’I’S
» n(BY«-__. R1 AND R2 – SER ED, R3 AND 124 SERVICE HELD
– _ ‘ . sm.’§r1c1ENT)
“II
bcaxing No.KA~37/3154 which was involvedjtg J
Therefore, it is contended that sijice ‘
unauthoxiaed passenger, the’ owné: . the VV
would be liable and the made V’
liabic to mimburse the, ”
4. In the backgit-1i:Tm;I”–Qf-,Vthé”–£:§2;itcntions urged on
behalf of the p¢tit;§oncr;” judgtncnt and
awaxti thc limited scope
of a petititm filed under
226 –C.0n.-stitution of india, since in
any evidcncc is not pczmissiblc.
Henge, all is ‘£0 fie éecn is as to whether there is noun
” pf and as to whether the judgment
on the face of it.
5}.” ‘ fiajs aspect in view, a perusal of the
j1;(1gI.l.1EI;t would indicate that the MAC!’ has noticed the
-.,Vt§an’.§cntion taken by th petitioner-lnsuxancc Company
‘3:
6. It is made clear that the .rcas9ns ‘
would indicate that the contention age _
has not been accepted,
examination in this as [. if any
connected matters since the 11:-
appmcziation of is possible in
an appeal,’ shall not prejudice
the case of £136 forum.
fiiarfithout mcxit and the same
is dispfi ” «of. costs.
Sd/..
Iudgé’
x V A f » AAJT;