The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs Sri M Krishna Reddy on 26 February, 2010

MIF.A.No,-4037/2009 and
MI'SC.Cvf.1 006752009

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE

DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2010' 

BEFORE

THE HON"BLE MRJUSTICE   I I

Miscellaneous Firgt Aggeal  V' J 

And Masc.cvI.1o067/2Ioe9"
BETWEEN:   

THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD_._  ._
REGIONAL OFFICE. LEO SII'O.I_DRIN.S' OO«M:PLEx_.
# 44»/45. RESIDENCY ROAD--._  2  u   
BANGALORE M 560 025   
REP. BYIIS DEpu'IYVMANAG,ER  I  1,»
SMTSUDHA GANESII'  '  - .;;APPELLANT

[BY SRE B.C.SE}E'.5i~IA¥IIIMA'Rf'IQI =ADVOCA'rE.

1 SRI'vv.M.KRISI»iNA-~-- '
S/O MUNIREDD'Y;'._ "   
AGE: AEIOILTT 5"? YEARS 

_ 2 SjM*I*.MUNIwNIKATAIv:IMA @ CHINNAKKA

 _ ..fLwf/Q.I M.KRISHNA-----REDDY
'  AGE: VAEOLIT 52 YEARS

 8GTIi«vAR.EfRESIDEN'I'S OF
-- A 'OEEDI.'M.A.I;s{ANAHALI,I VILLAGE
..,4I{YSASvIBAI'IALLI HOBLI. BANGARPEI"1'ALUK
KOLAR 'DISTRICT ..RESPONI)EN'I'S

1' I'   ' * {Dy SR} NIGOPALKRISHNA, ADVOCATE.)

  }vI.F.A. IS FILED U/S.1'73[1.) OF THE M.V.ACT AGAINST

  JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED: 11.06.2008 PASSED IN
 '=M_V'C.NO.4}32/2007 ON THE FILE OF THE XVI ADDITIONAL
'QJUDGE. MACT. BANGALORE CITY. AWARDING COMPENSATION



M. F.A.N0.4037/2009 and
MfSC.CvI.1006?(2009

OF Rs.4-1.2.500/-- VVETH INTEREST @ 6% PA. FROM THE DATE
OF PETITION TILL REALISATION. ; 

M1sc.cvL. Is FILED U/s.5 or' THE LIM1':'AT1oN'il:Ae'iif..
PRAYING TO CONDONE THE DELAY or' 225 DAYS i_l'\;1""'l'~*lI,1fr'aE"C__'r" ;_. 

THE APPEAL.

APPEAL AND MISQCVL. COMiNG__ON._FOR_' 
LA. THIS DAY, THE: coorrr DEI.I\fE2RE3DfI'l~lE_FOLI;OWiNQ:'--   " '  _ «

JUBGM§fiiJt

There is a delay of more  
days} in filing the   filed
for condonation of the  the learned
counsel    Insurance
Company   filed in support of
the appli¥_Cationdl?orw._ of the delay. In my

opinion, the_cause-- s}";.oV2Iri"'--.§s not sufficient to condone

__the inordinate lndelaly of more than seven months in

\_fifinggheappeat_Amconnngm;Aesecn¢100e7/200913

dismissed.'   V'

.2. lirmrgver'; in the interest of justice, I deem it

 lllagaprie-pzriate to modify the impugned judgment insofar

---.l.as""tlielldirection of the Tribunal to deposit the award

3,


z "g;
'E Xx

,5



M.F.A.No.403?/2009 and
Misc. Cw'. 1006712009

amount is concerned. Accordingly, I make the

following order:

(1) the Tribunal is directed to deposit 45%   

the compensation awarded in favourf» of. 

each of the respondents/

deposit in any nationalised:”–.Bank :1
period of ten years. ‘l’h§”‘ClaiInants-..sh_all~–.l5e'”
entitled to draw only… periodical “‘interest
accruing thereon.” and not be
entitled to raise_v:’a.n)i”__Vloan-.v.on_’:Vthe said
deposit.’ of cl;aini.ant_f{f3T€ erltitlfid
to ‘r.eni§.a’ir1ing 5% of the
_ a’I11_ourit.;… . .

(ii) tithe “lying in deposit with this
Court shall5b'(:,_ t’1*-ansferred to the Tribunal
. pp «nfiodification, the appeal Stands
Ed-_i ” ‘V . V
‘Appeal “dismissed. _
saia

is SJ-iil/-Ata