IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
WP(C).No. 13308 of 2009(G)
1. THE SECRETARY,
... Petitioner
Vs
1. THE SECRETARY,
... Respondent
For Petitioner :SRI.I.DINESH MENON
For Respondent : No Appearance
The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.GIRI
Dated :21/05/2009
O R D E R
V.GIRI, J
-------------------
W.P.(C).13308/2009
--------------------
Dated this the 21st day of May, 2009
JUDGMENT
Petitioner submits that he had applied for a
regular permit, and on its rejection the matter was
carried in appeal before the Tribunal in
MVAA.No.354/2006. It is stated that, by Ext.P1
judgment, the rejection was set aside and the matter
was ordered to be re-considered. According to the
petitioner, the matter was considered by the RTA as
per Ext.P2 proceedings dated 24.4.2007 and the
permit was ordered to be granted subject to the
conditions mentioned therein. Aggrieved by the
conditions in Ext.P2, he again approached the Tribunal
by filing MVAA.No.350/2007. Petitioner states that, by
Ext.P3 judgment rendered on 30th August, 2007 the
appeal was disposed of deleting the condition in
Ext.P2 to the extent it provided that the service on the
route Chavara-Adoor will have to be operated “with
full trips without any intermittent halts.” Complaint in
W.P.(C).13308/2009
2
this writ petition is that although the appeal was
disposed of as early as 30th August, 2007, the permit
that was granted as per Ext.P2, has not still been
issued.
2. If as stated by the petitioner, Ext.P3 judgment
rendered by the Tribunal in MVAA.No.350/07 has
become final and the petitioner has complied with all
other requirements, there is no reason why the permit
in terms there of shall not be issued. It is directed that,
if the judgment referred to above has become final
and the petitioner has complied with all other
requirements, the permit granted by Ext.P2 shall be
issued expeditiously.
Writ Petition is disposed of as above.
V.GIRI,
Judge
mrcs