High Court Karnataka High Court

The Special Land Acquisition … vs Sri Kallappa on 24 November, 2008

Karnataka High Court
The Special Land Acquisition … vs Sri Kallappa on 24 November, 2008
Author: K.Sreedhar Rao& Gowda
 

AT EHARWAD.

:N THE HIGH coum' OF KARNATAKA,  

DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY:  A
Pmssamj  j   %  
THE HONBLE MR.JUS"!i§3E 
THE HON'BLE MR.  GOWDA
 .1;  1si§::%j2i??.%
MFA;cR-as 14952903 123 mra 1531/2007

M.F.A:N'd;'1$'3 £   t  

1.

THE EWEGMIALmama’-%AcQU1sT1oN OFFICER

BRQADGLIAGE RAILWAY
~ HUHBLIAA ANKGLA-« ~

CHIEF’ ENGINEER (CONSTRUCTION)

‘ . ‘3OUTHi__WESTERN RAILWAY ZONE
“*CLl_3’B ROAD
HUBLI . . .APPELLAN’I’S.

u k » ‘ .(B5} Sri. ASHOK HARANAHALLI ASSOCEATES)

% 1; ” SR1 KALLAPPA

S/ O NEELAPPA UGARAGOL
AGE MAJOR REP. BY GPA HOLDER

SMT YELLAMMA D/O NEELAPPA
occ AGRICULTURIST

R/AT YELLAPUR COLONY J
HUBLI TQ HUBLI DIST % %

2. NEELAPPA _
s/0 GURUSIDDAPPA'{IGARGO{.V A
AGE MAJOR % – ”

occ AGRICULTURIST L
% R/AT YELLAPURCQLQNYVA _ ,

HUBLI TQ HUBL1*’.m’$T”% 1 ”

3. ASHOK F
s/0 GUI§ZU’SII)DAPPA
AGE ~ %
occ A’GRICUL’FI}RiSff ;

R/AT C0L0N¥.V%V%
HU’BL1’T<§2T HU13-3LI_DIST_ %

4. SURESH
s/0 GU*RUSIDi3AP_PA..;UGARGOL
AC’rE_MAJ’CR %
oggc AGRICU’LTURIE:”I’

‘ . R”/AT?…’1?ELI,APUR COLONY

% :H.UEL_I’TQ._HUBLI DIST RESPGNDENTS

» ffsy VS£:.;%%sAi:H1N.s MAGADUM ADV FOR
\(__IGHNES*HWAR s SHASTRI ADV pose C/R)

A MFA VIJS FILED U/S.54(1) OF’ LA ACT’, AGAINST THE

.’&.:AV: {fijDGME;NT AND AWARD DATED 22/9/06 PASSED IN

CROB 149/ 2008 IN MFA 163 1/ 2007

BETWEEM

1.

SR: KALLAPPA

s/0 NEELAPPA UGARAGOL ..
AGE MAJOR REP. BY GPA I~i0LmR<, .; %
SMT YELLAMMA :3/0 NEEIAPPAT 'h L

occ AGRICULTURIST % ~

R/AT YELLAPUR COLON?

HUBLI TQ HUBLI ms? ‘

S/O GURUSII3DAP}?A LIGz:.R<;<3L M
AGE MAJOR
occ AGRICULTU._RIST*~. V X _ 2 ~
R/AT YELLAF'!JR1CQI.C}NY % }
HUBLITQ

ASHOK [ V

sgfo GL!Ri;7SII§DAI.5f'A._UGARGOL

AGE MAJOR

OCC'''A('§RICIJL; ;

R; AT YELLAFKJR. COLONY

.. 4}?-IUBLI TQm:_BL3 DIST.

* A _ “:5/0_GUR;Us1DDAPPA UGARGOL
~ Aemaxmjon

%% X can A;m1cULnIR1sT

1.

“R/’AT”[ELLAPUR COLONY

EHJELI TQ HUBLI DIST. CROSS OBJECTORS

(By Sri. SACI:{IN.S MAGADUM ADV FOR

SRI VIGHNESHWAR S SHASTRI ADV)

THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISTION OFFICER
BROADGUAGE RAILWAY

%/

HUBLI ANKOLA
ANKOLA

2. THE DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER A(c%§i¢,é§*:*9:§>u€:r:o2§

sown WESTERN RAILWAY ZONE E %
CLUB ROAD . .

HUBLI . * ‘E . .RfV:’;t”‘a»’?i;”()_1_V’yIV:1V)_1:«’)Is3’I’;’-3.VL’

(By Sri. ASHOK ASStCt€fIA9’1§FS)

THIS CROSS VOBJECH’ WIS –._P’ILED, AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND AWARD EA; «iEDHf_2A2V/’9/O6 PASSED IN
LAC No.36/04 ON THE ‘FILE__ OF ‘i’~HE~..’i?RL.CIVIL JUDGE
(SRDN), HUELE, ~.%§LLO1E(ING’:A’i’HE REFERENCE
PETITION FOR ENHAEICED’ COMPE’R”~SA’I’ION.

_. ..’a5m.q’;V«¢Y€5-.$”~=?55¢¢*f_V50#rJ

This TAppe_a1″ is or: for hearing this day,

SREEDH.AR’RAO’;I d<_:ii–vcred~t.hé following: —

A atinranmm

Special Land Acquisition Officer

– ..Enavé.j%”cGme’E– _jup Lappeal challenging the gant of

_as excessive. The claimants have filed

seeking enhancement of compensation to

. , , ” ‘ Rs.i26,(3-{) (‘)’:. per gunta.

. The appellants have aoquirw some other lands by

” Ilotification dated 12.5.05 for the same

ifpurpose and the said lands are similarly piaced. The land

Gk

The counsel for the appellants submit.$”.fiiat

valuation is made and higher W(3ourt_”ft:e ::d by

inadvertence. The Registry to veiaiéijr exbsss .

Court fee, if any, paid on the’ V

sax.

'    udge

  sa/--
Judge