?P~©mfl@wéwwr
IN3THEHKHiCOURTCH'KARNATAKA,BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 11 3" DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2009
PRESENT
THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE KSREEDHAR 1
AND
THE E~1ON'BLE MR. JUS'I'IC'E"'H;BI'L;AI3fv§A'V:»
M.E.A. NO. 7951 O§*.2OO5'T
BETWEEN:-- V I A
THE SPECIAL LANE AcgU1sI*1*1O1\aO-§2'F~zcER, " -
VISVESWARAIAH TOWERS, 1I1fFLQOR_.
DRAMBEDKAR VEEDHI,' ' ' '
BANGALORE. H '-
- APPELLANT
[BY SR1 sANGAMEs1»i G.*.;>ATIL, Gv.r?.)----.'~ A
13.5. I'§JE*usH'EKAR; _
3 i_;V1JAYAMURf_1fHY, V
- B. 5;; ..K.E;sHNA '1v1'O'R'I'HY.
_ T. V; » A/IKMA'
g SUNANLTAMMA,
""11sHO13AMMA,
BHAGYAMMA.
, _ JAGADEESH PRASAD,
Fr''.O'
'' ALL ARE R/O. GUBBALALU VILLAW.
UTTARAHALLI HOBLI,
BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK,
aL/
OR
NO.1980. 4?" CROSS, 20?" MAIN,
JP. NAGAR II PHASE.
BANGALORE -- 78.
2. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
B.W.S.S.B., MALLESWARAM.
BANGALORE.
(BY SR: GURUDEV 1. GURUCHCHINAMATH; -ADV... FOR' R12} -.
THIS M.F.A. IS FILED U/S.' 5.4m
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT ANS .AWAF{I) DATE13r'30V.vO9.2Q04 _
PASSED IN LAC N013?/99 ON .,fmE EH;E.._'ovE_11'-,AnDL.~C1TY '
CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE,t"=.EtANGALo.R_E*'Cm/, CCH
No.17, ALLOWING TEE RJs;EEREN'C_E PETITION FOR
ENHANCED CoMPENSA1f§oN. 5
This appeai is Con_1tng 'he::-ding this day,
SREEDHAR deiivedred the._fo_1V1oWing5
The land was' Tor the benefit of respondent
No.12.’ Sn’. G{1ruAde’v”Gaehehinmath, Counse} for respondent
.aVNo.i’2V.sti’bmi”tS’_ thatwoiifsuant to the award made they have
I paid Coinpensation amount to the iandowners.
R€SAp§_’)V1’1d’€i1T.._ has deposited the Compensation amount
the exeeuting Court. Respondent No.12 has not filed any
against the award on the ground that the
_ Compensation award d is excessive. It is the LAO who is in
appeai chalienging the compensation awarded the
Reference court as excessive. When the benefici.arL$,f’-«._:if1a,s
aireacly deposited the compensation and does V.
the award. it is untenable for the LA{) to_.’fi1e–:;é£:j; “‘
Accordingly, the appeai is disrizissecli’, ‘« Q – é
eTUDGE
Sd/-Ex
UDGE