IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, CIRCUIT BENCH AT
DHARWAD.
DATED THIS THE 2"" DAY OF MARCH zmoe
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR.IUsTICE I~?;I-:.I°ATIIg S I
THE HON'BLE MR. IUSTICEA.s;I?AC1%IHAI>UI{E
M.F.A. No;I'23755--I2{'Io}9 (L;AC;) .
Between: " ., ~
Project Sea Bird, I\I'aIfa]VBaé'e,> ' "
Karwar.
The Special Land 2
(By KB. Ad}Ivyapa!.ry,_
f) Smt. Sushma xjév./o 'S.:Lv!i'.6Sh' V'
Chendiye,'i_ ' _
Taiuk: Karwar. .
g) Smt. swati W/o s::a.zg,rshan%_\/retri,
" 'R./Q Sa,ikat1_:_a, Kodibag, """
¥_Ta1u}<.; Karwar, , ' V
7. Vaasafir{.:jma:%N§i1<V7}j'"
Since <;14eceavseda'byahis L.Rs.
~ S1nt.Suioéhaé1a w/o vasant Naik,
4 r Mai0r;--Ry0t,
_ *-R/0_M1_1d.ga, Amaciaili,
-TaIu'k:Karwar.
b) Sri. Pandurang s/o vasant Naik,
Major, Ryot, R/0 Mudga, Amadalli,
Talukz Karwar.
C) Sri. Surendra s/o vasant Naik,
Major, Ryot, R/o Mudga, Amadaili,
Taluk: Karwar.
d) Surekha gurudas Naik, V
Major, Ryot, R/o Muclga, AmadaIl_i,«.
Taluk: Karwar.
e) Smt.Kan1akshi Arun Naik, ,_ _ _ V ' «.
Major, Ryot, R/0 Mudga, Ariiadalh, f
Talukr Karwar. " . v_ '
f) Sushila D/o vasarrt
Major, Ryot, Rio Txétudga,
Taluk: Karwar. " ' ._
8. Ponkya B:edu_Gouda,--ii.__»4"ii ' -
R/o Mudga, A'mada.1ii,-.
Karwar. .-
9._ _ The Def Estate 0ffi_oer,.
Kamataka &'.Goa Circle,
-- Respondents
j _ T_This appear is flied LE/S 54(1) ofthe Land Acquisition Act, 1394
jjjagainst the order dated 30.11.2006 in L.A.C. No. 69/91 on the file of
"._Addi':i_ona1 Civil Judge (Sr. D11), Karwar.
//
Tjgis appeal coming on for orders this day, N.K._I_'_atil }.,
delivered the following: 1
JUDGMENT
1. Though this matter is posted for _orde_rs”ii*egardi’ng}_non
compliance of office objections, the ma’tter7i_lislitalienl up
disposal in View of the judgment oflthelikpex Court “;;in’1ilar”mlattersl’
as submitted by the Government Advo’c’ate_.f ll
2. The appellant being aggr’ieve33l byfithell judgment and
award dated llNol.Wl69/9} on the file of
Additional Cipv.i.l.l_.Jud~gl_e’ Diij, Karw’ar;…piiesented this appeal.
3. A Govemrnegnt’ Advocate appearing for appellant at the outset
submitted thatpthe A’pex”Cou1’t in similar matters has confirmed the
award passed by the reference Court.
Therelforei’._the””1’ei*i.e_f”~sought for in the appeal does not survive for
llv?’s3consideratilon andhthe appeal may be dismissed as having become
.1 –inifi’uctuious..p
/’
fill
4. Submission 0% Government Advocate is placed on record. The
appeal filed by the appeilant is dismissed as having-._ ‘beeome
infructuous. Ordered accordingiy.
bvv