High Court Karnataka High Court

The Spl Lao Hidkal Dam Project vs Shri Kadappa Basavanni Munnoli on 27 November, 2008

Karnataka High Court
The Spl Lao Hidkal Dam Project vs Shri Kadappa Basavanni Munnoli on 27 November, 2008
Author: K.Sreedhar Rao& Gowda
MFA '?"?'% of 2094

IN THE HIGH COURT 0? KARNATAI(_$v- I  u 

cmcurr BENCH AT DHARWAI}, ' :7]:  V
mzran THIS THE 2?». my e§é"fi¢a%£MB1§1é§':»xac8}:% ; 
PRE>S_EN'I'a ~._A '*.V    V VA 
THE HOWBLE MR.JU§f§ {§E.K. x
     

THE HON'BLE MR.JiIST'i(fE. 5ia;s:§L§:Er§z\?tasE GOWDA

 

Miscmmzs  F::2:~:~%'r1~z§,;éff2'561& (gg

 :€.  %

1. The;vSpeciTai.TL«a11d'i.Acgtii3ition--
omcaer %imxjTPm.ieet, %
2. Neeravaz'i.N'3"gam Ltd.,
 ?A0tfice,"#$?_§ floor,
 Building, 'riu;'1,

- 1, _I_)r.B."R,Anibedkm~._ Veedm

 %  the

'  300%. ...Appel]£u11:s

 (By Sr;  Aéfil.  t Adv. for Appclhnt no.1
 AA _Szi3*2=i.I(.Him_gou£iar, M.R.C.Raa:siri& Ramachandrm,

' "  "fizz: appellant 3213.2} -

«   fiafiprpefimt no.2 imgleaded Vida Cam'! order dt.2'?.11.mO8)

 1. Shri Kwappa Baasavanm Mimnoli,

30/



MFA 7756 of 2604

. Basavaraj Ishwar Pafil,
. Ravindra Ishwar Patil,

2
3

4. Shankaragonda Shivagouda   ii» 
5. Satyagouda Malagouda Pagn.   X
5. Armagouada Malagouda 

7. Kempawwa, W/o  A'
3. Balappa ChannaPP%1"4'C3V11$i§1§'?-'3-;*1e::V  _
9. Virupaxi  _V '  % 
10. Kadappa   ' 

1 1. Ishwar  

1 1A. Iamfiiai rshwai  " _
respondcrgts' 3, 1 &._11A«sim:_c' 
by their LR:.-a._4 '   %  " . 

1) S;1,i¢f."Sbivale£éia..Vl:vvV!V_a;u§i  ,
  . did Afp Eulaflaupiii', 'I'q: Hukkcri,
 » 93"" --.B¢13'5'."'mf

A 2) Sm  Chougala,
6/0 A] 9 S:-Lzataxzpur, Tq: Hukked,
Dist: 

 farguman   "swans, D/o Ishwar Patil,
 %  vd/"(IA/p Sh1'igaon,'I'q: I-Iukkcri,
" _  Belgaum.

   'M.&3':l80uda Kadappa Madhagouda,
"  mum' agenda Kadappa Madhageuda,



MFA 7756 of 2004

14. Basavaxaj katiappa Madhagouda,  .._' 
15. Shankaragouda Kmiappa Madhagouda, .__  V 

16. Girigouda Shivarudra        ,  
17. Ramazma Shivamdra  % .2 @

13. Shankargouda Shivagouda'*i;§ifiL 3

19. Mallikazjam Adopttm':~.fathci*'""'  

Shicigouda Hidka],   _ _

20. Basagouda  " 
deceased  V    
20(A) Muttcppjfa _MacI3n'gQuda"""

21. Ramagéud.-;_' 

by I,.R3; 
21A.  
22. Shivé1ing%I<adapj;Sé;. hiéfiihigouda,

 resi&'ez_1 fof Shiragaon,

  Advocate)

up-.«--...«u~..-...<

  m1ace ' Raucous fimt appml is filed under Secuo.n'

 54(1) offiand Acquisition Act ag&st the judgment and
*  dated 23.02.2005 passed in LAC No.5/2001 on the
 L*iL':,of§th¢ Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.), Hukkexi, partly allowing the
--  mzfemnce petition four enhanced compensation.

  This  us fixst apfil coming on for hcarhlg I
 this day, K.Smedhar Rm, J, delivered the folkrwing:

if



MFA 'F756 of 2004

J U D G M E N T

I.A.No.!/2005 is al.-iowcd.
Nccravari Nigam Ltd., is
titie tube amended. V V V V V V V

2. I.A.Nos.2 to 4’§_f’:!OOT?Viz; Orb;-;n§g1£;g L.Rs. of
deceased mspontlent title to be
amended.

33″ takes notice fior
L.Rs. Vn’Vo. 11 and other respondents»-

claimantsfi *

4; _V’I”h§ 1$Vfids'””6f the claimants an: acquired for

This Court in M.F’.A.No.9$4/2006, in

ly placed lands acquired’ for the same

has granted aompcnsatsion at the rate of

V»E§’i9;VI’,–9;0,{V50O/- per acre after considering the S ¢ yicfl,

— incurred for jaggery pxcparatslons and the net

V’ VVVi:iV1coIz1c from the yiefi ofjaggcry.

MFA ‘T756 of XXJ4

:5:

6. The Lands in question are similafly °gg§d«

acquired for the same purpose. In the

reference Court: has -1

prcpaxation of jaggery. In that

cla1man’ ts ans: entitled to at_ .= of ‘V

Rs.1,90,G0O/ – per befi£:fi ts'”a s against

Rs.1,95,000/— awarded 153%
Appeal