High Court Karnataka High Court

The Spl Lao vs Munishamappa on 17 April, 2009

Karnataka High Court
The Spl Lao vs Munishamappa on 17 April, 2009
Author: K.Sreedhar Rao Gowda
 

iN"E'iE"1}€:E'AiE{}}-i «::s::>me*1*e:>: 'SEES 'mg 17% mY%1%&}:: 1+-ié*Es;;'i::';g:}é<2. (5:13Sii'i¥f£iE3"E§§'SiREE_E§.f§3'iffiSE GOWEEA
 u ,i:_'4':£'.V.};'?;.'}§z.'   m?~*::004-
 ~~~~   
 % ':%a':(~.%.1s',«;».;§:;::}£a E49,. 4?': <3? 2&9?
§».e:.%:m. f*~'£'c:5 ?¢'%»i}4%%V.Vj{3i§%i"  

B;g*i*%;~.:§2:T:5§~e ;  u

 % A 5:§;v§*'§%§(§1Ez§aE;"':{;fiAs§?'~§E)

 *Aa"::;)é.3;$§?:§*§.<3§&£' <;)E?'}'<"'E<;':E§<i,
 V£'S'§37§§}E§§¥i5;§%flIAE-I czgjwma,
A $333 }%'§,;{}{.§£{, I?"<I)DE§v'i §L<;}<;:§a:,
"'««._B§&__'éIi;",§.z**--1*:¥L{Z3}*«%¥: M {E 2..
- APPELLANT

   {BY_.S§€'i~---$3, mRAYANA?aé,, GvE:R:~.:ME3séT z%i'j'}'J{3£EATE}

' . 'g§,;?%E?;§;'~

   32%'; B:iL}%§§.$}iAE&AP§§A,

age, §{f§s§{i%.?§3E"1,
zv:AJ;:€, EriA'E"§'i4L?(;'}{}§,;LA.§§;§E,§,§' VELLAGEZ,
EfiE£}AE;'£§-i§%i.£;§ ;~£<:3m.:,

6%..



 

tn.)

BEN (_}AL(}E€§33 S(}U'1'H ' 'ALLEK,
BANGALGRE 'DiS'i'R'IC'P,

2, 1::E2<'E1\2c:E: RESEARCH AND  . _ 
};)E1VE',LOP'MENT 0RGAN'ISA'§'§f3N,"'« A_  ; 
<_:AMBm3GE ROM},   
app v;:,:v:.s. (BFFICE,

AGARAM mm', % _   V
BANGALC*¥~3E-~G'?. %    
     RESPONDENTS

(31? SR1 (LN. VENL¥GOE?&”L, P{i3V{3€A’fE3..FQR R1)”

(BY SRE I-1.€.’:I*»?I:i:I<z*r"'AND,AWARD :3'1'.29.3.20o3
PASSES EN' LAC/£I3""O'N THE FELE OF THE
LEARNED Ii",A.'{\fE?$J-GifFYA.V'(3£VIL 31.11333, BAN'GAL(i)RE,

{scam1f7);"ALL;:;w1'.&;;'{:z *:*HE REFERENCE E'E'FI'I'E(3N FOR
ENHANQEFJ' c::»I,%’ %

M.F.A. (:R(:’E33.” N30} 4*? 3; :§:;’2’*–_..: 2{é§§;>7 ; —

..S§%1_E»§”‘U§*E’iv$HAMAPPfi,
$;@}m&aam,
. %”;é;%’Lj:~eig:-K} 01:2,
‘*-‘R/_:’~*£’F .§{}X’}*I’U GOLLAHALLI \:’ILLAC§E,
Bii”§s&RA1%ALL’E HOBLE,

. BA1*~E’GALGR}-“S EAST TALUK.

{ZRQSS GBJZQCTQR

gm: 3:2; cm. V’ENU€;}O?AL, ABVQEEATE)

” “‘~2§\EEi):w

1. THE? SPECIAL LAN?) ACQUISET§(}N GFFECER,
‘VTSHVESEIWARAYA TOWER, ;

3R1} ?LC>OR,

PODIUEVE BLOCK,
BANGfiLORE – 0 1.

2. BE§’#~%, <53A,:%'(.:R_ R'1;%
(BY SE13}: 3.0. sUNnARE'S§3;

‘E’E–iiS:’ :\e:§s*zs.,k<::{'%:::B°:%:%~A: M:%a'-%:\:s:).4044/2(;o4 FILES
:5/0339.112; .2'2"«<I)Ef_V.V§CPC, AGAINST THE
&UDGE.~3MEN'Z'{'?,j_., gm _ 'A_V€ARE DATED 29.03w2a-.;245;*-1§’99 99% THE mg GE? 21%
{3E’I’Y <::mL' £3<37'iJ_1R"E','-E£§:N{32§LORE, ?ARTL-Y ALLQWENG
THE REI%*9'§:}"~Z§§?=é€3E?;..v"'«?v§;"1§'I'I'I{i3§'~£ FQR ENHAN£3E§
€:0M;PEE§FSAT§{:E§"" "AND SEEKENG FURTHEEE

* _E£*€vi{I§i;I\E_A(f:E"§vIEN'1" %}.?'–€L3GMPENSA'i'§ON.

V' Crass Gbjfittififi are cammg 9;} far
;13,&é;:jing'«f§§3i$'.§éay, SREEIDHAR R36, .13., deiiverad the

ffifigfiring; ,, _
J U § G M E N T

Sri. EVE Narajganappa is directeci to take naiica far

the app€§}a11'£»State.

Delay of 283 days in fiiirig the appeal is ned.

1.A.N0.l1/ ()4 is allowed.

The deiay 03° 964 days in f2.b1:1g the _

is cenéoneci subject: ‘:0 the caizditign ?;haI”i;1*zé:j~cI3:{:11a1’1§’ v ‘V

xvii} not be entitieci to claim iI1t{::’est:'[fs?)ré’=fi_i€:.’

deiay. A<:{:oI°i§aa§¢1’~V_.g11d.h’ mg;qgV;Tz:/200?
flied by ‘£116 cr{)ss~0¥q}e{i”iffif-1i§:f'{}§i§:§§é5fiS§§§tion is diSI}1iSSf3d

as net pressed._ ‘

is aéémred far the ;:au1**pose af
§}§’%’I£L’v’C§J. “i”3:;1i$ t§f3Lé’«:§i:11i1ar}§; piaaed cases ‘%5.?13€31″€:

the I:a.1′::<:iAs are V-acqtiirfli for the: same pmrpesa, Liiliier {Em

Ii'<:§1§fic3ti0m have bear; awarded vé:r111”:1€:T1t. fer z*e(i’a.;ct.i9:1 is fiisnzissgd. “T113 C}Z’€)S$-

o’i:sj:~:c£icm is aiismzeci with ctasts»

The 1*&gist1*§J is directed net ta draw the award

“aha m’0ss-objecztitm mxtii the deficit court fee is paid’

Judge

Gpsfi’