High Court Patna High Court - Orders

The State Of Bihar &Amp; Ors vs Akhila Nand Singh on 13 August, 2010

Patna High Court – Orders
The State Of Bihar &Amp; Ors vs Akhila Nand Singh on 13 August, 2010
                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                          LPA No.136 of 2007
                    1. The State of Bihar
                    2. The Commissioner cum Secretary, Road Construction Department,
                       Govt. of Bihar Patna
                    3. The Chief Engineer, Central Design Organization Road
                       Construction Department, Bihar Patna
                    4. The Superintending Engineer, High way Planning & Investigation
                       Circle, Road Construction Department, Patna 15
                    5. The Technical Advisor of Superintending Engineer, High way
                       Planning & Investigation Circle, Road Construction Department,
                       Patna
                                                               Respondents- appellants
                                                  Versus
                       Akhila Nand Singh S/o Later Keshwar Singh resident of village
                       Ismailpur PO Bhawar Sikaria PS Korawana (Kerauna) Dist.
                       Jehanabad
                          At present employee of High way Planning & Investigation
                       Circle, Road Construction Department, Central Design Organization
                        Building Vishweshwariya Bhawan, Bailey Road Patna 15
                                                                 Petitioner- Respondent
                                         --------

09/ 13.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned

counsel appearing for the private respondent.

The order under appeal is a short order whereby the writ

court did not decide any issue as to whether the provisional promotion

to the writ petitioner granted on 28.02.2004 was valid or not or

whether cancellation of lien of the writ petitioner with effect from

03.01.1989 was proper or not. The writ court simply directed to the

competent authority to grant appropriate posting to the petitioner in

the light of the order dated 28.02.2004. The order of the writ court

could not be given effect to because of stay order passed in this appeal

and today learned counsel for the writ petitioner who is respondent

herein has informed this court that the writ petitioner has already

superannuated from service.

In view of such subsequent development, no issue relating
-2-

to posting of the writ petitioner can survive. Hence this appeal as well

as writ petition are now found to be infructous. The appeal is disposed

of accordingly.

(Shiva Kirti Singh, J)

(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J)

shahid