High Court Karnataka High Court

The State Of Karnataka Rep By Its … vs B L Hadimani S/O Lingappa on 6 April, 2009

Karnataka High Court
The State Of Karnataka Rep By Its … vs B L Hadimani S/O Lingappa on 6 April, 2009
Author: P.D.Dinakaran(Cj) & V.G.Sabhahit
  3  ~r1ié,A{jDL.DiREcT0R GENERAL 0;? POLICE

 ._   ,KA§é':é.Air~AfI»I::'t;~ENERAL AND ENSPECTOR
_f}ENER}%L. OF:POi,.iC'E KARNATAKA STATE
,,4_s.€NRuPATH:5VN;3A RAOD, BANGALORE 1.

" _ '*;.R1*=:cRt£:'r:&.«:Ez~z*r AND TRAINING)
g 'CAR.L?Qz€ HOEJSE,

 PALACE RGAD, COMMON
E,zA1€.GALoRE 1.  PETITIONERS

S] O LIRGAPPA
ERAS CONSTABLE E COY

 



4?}! EN. KSRP,
KORAMANGALA   
BANGALORE 34, I

2 K L SALAWAL

S/O IMAM HGSEN _   ,  
RESERVE SUB INSi9E(YI'G"%1%Vi)IS'TRI(3'If  
ARMED RESERVE BELGA'£j_M..V(N--QW UNDER .
ORDERS OF CQMFQLSQRY'R§«;'z'1REMEN1j"* 
R/AT HG ROOM §¥2s.'Z1.£;2;, '§'C):¥gi€:E3V--1*I«E',}'s~Ii}
QUARTERS, DIST'.  '    ' w
ARMED RE$.ERvEA.ggLGA'L¥M ' '

3 C}ifiU_§.'_EG§3"U.DAR    " 
5,10 ¥éEAN¥,}.MA"%"_I'HAGQi;¥D;%  
RESEWS/'lE3.. .i3'§"}LIC E .I1*¥".~?-§E'E1{;'"i'€)I%?§
m$'FR.1;C}7? Afifaa'-5E3'-.1§E5';_SERT'»'.'?;B"
HAvER§".::*§.ow'?VUN-DER O_Ri'}ERS OF'
c{3M;mLsog;'z_RETIR§:-MENT)

R/AT KIRANV N;.LA?';a.__  
BANESWARI' NAs.»AR_1;~

_.}%.AVERi.    -  RESPQNDENTS
(8y..S;*i: 3 V sHA£a~f:'R}__§':3R C/R )

' '£'lF:iI:'i§3§E3'VA.'\Fx?.Ps. ARE FILED PRAYING TO QUASH THE

_J1§} D_GMVE1«Z§'i'~I}T."..1~<L1{).2OO8 ASSED BY THE KARNATAKA

ADE»1.1NIS"i'RATI~§?"i.§E TRIBUNAL BANGALORE IN A?PLCiIATICtN
NG..__4510_,£20{3-'F (Z1/W. A'N{}S. 452312007 AND 4550x2007

V . VI{)E" AN-N "'}-'I-A BY ALLOWING THIS WRIT PETITION.

'I'I:'z'é$e Writ petitians cc.:3m§3:1g up far ¥'I*&3§minazy

HS.-&V2§::i3::_\g on this «day, SABHAHIT J., deiivemd the foflowing.

O R D E R

These Writ petitions are flied by the State baing

aggriaved by the oxtier datfid 14.10.2008 passed by the

W

Karnataka Administrative Tribunal (hcminafisr Ca11¢€§i.._:’fl7;e

KAT’) in Application N93451::/200?, 452s;_2’£1Eménf’: fér L.

taking f}L’€Sh action in the maife1£ i.e. c<§i1sid7r;:9i11g }:tl:u~': say
'given by the appiicam «to csxtiéf respect

9f the applicants.

2. é “”‘%’11ed Appiiasation
Nos.4s1§/_2%;af§. Q ;<z~é'$5e/200? before the
Tfibunafi. _' Poiice Gfixccr-3 in the
§{am1atai§a..Sia.te A joint deparimenta} enquiry

was }_1 “” 3:1’ misconéuct raiating to financial

$4;-szeliction of duty etc, T116 syecialiy

emApg>’%§verafi– by rnaperé heid that the charges had

‘-been p”rg{%ad against thesis: thrae applicazats and another

S:r:LB.N.Shettanna12avar. After cansidaring the inquixjsg

réjgafi, the Governmsnt as S:isci§li1:’1a2*}s’ Authozity, issued

kfl

4

secend sham? cause notice: ts thfi delinquent

officzials asking them ta Show cause as to why ”

1:101: be accepted and major penalty sheuid ‘fl(}:t ;5’€ u u

each of them and tha ‘tfiééifivljexfigfianafion
in response to the _’ m3t:i'<A:A:€ 3.¥1d by
impugfied orfier compulsory'
retirement Q35?" ' and dimctixxg
withholdingifif f11sfi(~:1’iz1g the repmsentation reganiiing propogszd

punishment, impugneé archer 0f imposing penalty has been

\r°

passed and iherefere, the said ordex caxmot : V’

and accerciirigly, set aside the

remitted the matter to the Govezi2.me-.fif:’*VV

action in the matter afiier -by 9:135
applicants and page T. three
aiaplications. Being ag:g”1’ie’ved«–. L. order dated
14.10.2008, the State vfieifiiions.

3. We §_ha;;’e’ appearing for the
peti€tieI;e;«S__VVV’ appearing for

respone1ent$—-caveato:_14; v » ” ”

4. submitted that diseipiizlaxy

‘_va1;t}:c’i:*.ity__iA}1a;s paeSe:i___£he Gender in aceorciance with law and

not justified in setting aside the ozder of

– w–. the matter and the zzmrier Of the

‘V Eaéaie to be set aside.

V’ 2 The learned emmsei appearing for the respandents

V’ sulivmitted in support of the order passed by the Tribunal

KP’

6

6, We have givan camfu}. ccnsideration _ !’..:;):

contention of the learned cleanse} appearing for.–§i§é’ _

and scrutiizified the materaial an mcertii

‘5’. The material on record wclfiai

se<::<31r1::i Shaw cause notice L:

hereifl to Show Cause as W’.1l}’ij,-fi.%l.]’:(‘.31″‘L’V§3f_§.I1é3.1.t’}7″‘shfiuiéx not be
imposed upon them: iéhazeh submitted
their }T’E3I3I”t*iS(iI1?.a’§?’3′.§VI1v__71I1 ivfifigfice. Hswever,
the Discip1i;g:5-fly csrdczr imposing
penaity J’Wi_fC1vi!V.'(L3i,3.?;f:’ Ii1%~f§::vV’V?§’§i;:«;§1’é$e11tations submitted
by the :15$SpGfi£}é§fiiS. -‘therefore, the Tribune} has
rightly héid. ‘i.’Va’LVe” ‘=.-:V;’:’1§14E::.i={: (4an41″V.’.imposition of penalty by the

discipgliflézxy authafitfir is not passed 113:1 accardanca with sub

f’L:«}gv. of Kaxnataka State Pslice: (Di$<:ip}.m' any

I $965 and acccrdingiy, set aside £2116 ()I'd€I'

Z af {if penalty and remitted the matter to the

authority for takifig fI'{iSh acticm in the matter

V' éonsidaring the represenfation given by the apylicants

to__ the second show cause: and pasa final (}IYd€tI"S, in

K}