High Court Punjab-Haryana High Court

The Supreme Industries Limited vs State Of Punjab And Others on 12 November, 2009

Punjab-Haryana High Court
The Supreme Industries Limited vs State Of Punjab And Others on 12 November, 2009
      IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
                      CHANDIGARH.

                                                             CWP 1577/2005
                                                 Date of Decision: 12.11.2009

The Supreme Industries Limited
                                    ..........Petitioner

            Versus

State of Punjab and others

                                 ..........Respondents


CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.KUMAR
       HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH.

Present:    Mr.KL Goyal,Senior Advocate with
            Mr.Sandeep Goyal,Advocate for the petitioner.
            Mr.Piyush Kant Jain,Addl.AG Punjab for respondents.


1. To be referred to the Reporter or not ?
2. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest ?


M.M.KUMAR,J.

This order will dispose of CWP Nos. l577 and 1712 of 2005 as

common questions of fact and law are involved in these petitions. Facts are

being taken from CWP No.1577 of 2005.

The petitioner has approached this Court impugning the order

dated 11.12.2004 (Annexure P/12) passed by the Assessing Authority-cum-

Excise and Taxation Officer, canceling the exemption granted to the

petitioner from payment of sales tax vide order dated 16.4.2001 (Annexure

P/7). The aforesaid order was passed on the basis of eligibility certificate

issued on 13.3.2001 (Annexure P/5). It has been pointed out by the learned

State counsel that under Section 20 of the Punjab General Sales Tax

Act,1948, the order passed by the Assistant Excise and Taxation
CWP 1577/2005 2

Commissioner is appealable and without availing the remedy of appeal the

writ petition would not be maintainable.

Mr. Goyal, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he may

be permitted to withdraw the petitions with liberty to approach the

appellate authority. He further states that under Section 20, 60 days’ period

is provided for filing appeal and since the petition has been pending before

this Court, there is delay in approaching the appellate authority.

Accordingly, he states that the petitioner would file the appeal within a

period of two weeks and no objection with regard to delay in filing of

appeal be raised by the respondent-State.

It is appropriate to mention that the instant petition was filed

on 27.1.2005 which was admitted on 4.5.2005 when the following order

was passed which reveals that the learned Additional Advocate General,

Punjab was present. The said order reads as under:-

” Rule D.B.

List the matter for final disposal on 1.8.2005.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties

and bearing in mind the fact that the eligibility

certificate issued by the Industries Department was

clarified vide letter dated 18.11.2004 issued by the

General Manager, District Industries Centre, Patiala

and the said clarification has not been specifically

challenged by the Assistant Excise and Taxation

Commissioner, we are of the view that the petitioner

has made out a good case for grant of interim relief.

Accordingly, we stay the operation of
CWP 1577/2005 3

impugned order dated 11.12.2004 (Annexure P.12).

We clarify that in the event of the petitioner failing in

this writ petition, it shall be liable to pay the sales-tax

on the sales affected by it along with interest , as

may be directed by the Court.”

In view of the above, we relegate the petitioner to the remedy of filing

appeal. If the appeal is filed within a period of two weeks from the date of

receipt of a copy of this order, then the same shall not be dismissed on the

ground that there is delay because against the order dated 11.12.2004 the

writ petition was preferred on 27.1.2005 which itself was within a period of

60 days. It is well settled that approaching a forum different than the one

statutorily provided would not be hit by the delay and the cause of action

can still be agitated before the alternative forum. These principles are

incorporated in Section 14 of the Limitation Act,1963. We further make it

clear that the appellate authority shall decide the matter expeditiously

preferably within a period of three months. If an adverse order is passed by

the appellate authority the same shall not be given effect to for a period of

two weeks so as to enable the petitioner to avail the remedy of further

appeal to Tribunal.

The writ petitions stand disposed of in the aforesaid terms.





                                                       (M.M.Kumar)
                                                           Judge



12.11.2009                                            (Jaswant Singh)
joshi                                                      Judge