High Court Karnataka High Court

The Tahsildar vs Sri M B Shankara on 4 March, 2010

Karnataka High Court
The Tahsildar vs Sri M B Shankara on 4 March, 2010
Author: Anand Byrareddy
RSA 1703/'08

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORET

DATED THIS THE ()4'%"'E' DAY 01%' MARCH 2(.)1€>~~E%E%  

BEFORE

THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND 

REGULAR SECOND ,i\PPE'.?§_1;-N<s.l"'/'£1'3: 0.1-:  
BETWEEN:

1.

The Tahsildar, _E E»
Sringe1’iTalEk. ‘
Sringmi M 577 «I V

2. The Chief5Sec;:*e£t;i’1’y’-~.. A
to G()\/_¢:_1_i1j11*1’c.VrMi’t’, 7i.;__ _ , ‘V
Vid11;.i11a S'(m:fi’ih_2.1, _
B:;mgalor’e’– 56(}’Of)jiE. ‘

3. The Rzinge F01’e’;x=–t (}f’E’i:c.:”1″-..–

S1″i11g_e1’i I{4:i:x_s;1VL”. . A ._
5;,-1_;§ge1~§. — 577 +39. APPELLANTS

{B}}”S«hriH§ K”u_;11.ar, Addiiional Government Advocate)

Sl”a1″i”;S ha xi ‘ ‘

v “”-«S/0 De \{_apuja1*i, ” ‘
Aged z;1b(.5ut yezxrsfi

RSA 1’/’O3fO8

LJ

Resident of Miginaikaihi,
Kavadi Viliage.

Kasaba Hobii.

Sflngefi”fifluk«w577i39. n.I{ESPCwH)ENi”p

.u .5: .54. .;. :3:

L -. ‘1’ -w .

This Regular Second Appeai isiiifiied L=.n”de”r~i:’_Seet.it)ii

100 of Code of Civil P!'()C63CiLl}’C._ 1.908 zigziiiimv the ‘:j’U'(.:,E’gci_’V11.¢vi’]iE.’V .
and decree dated 29.l().2.()(‘)7 passed in R.’=A.I’J_p.t~E’i4(i)f2_()()¢}”oh the
file of the Principal l)istrict Judge. »Chiki11a’gaIua’. dism’.i.s$i’:’1g {he

appeal fiied agaiiiist the judgment iaz1d”~»d_eeree’
passed in O.S.N0.1 E3/I996 on the fiieiefithe Cii/’ii. J”ud’ge (‘Junior
Division) Sringeri. .

This Appeal coming up .f(31’i01;i}E1’S__i[i1iVS…dL1.y, the Court
deiiveredthe f0Ei0wing.:~ V’ i ” ‘”

dhiQfiQM£NT

Thg;’:”espt>nde’-at i’ii”21’Vi11g; died, no steps are taken to bring his

i’§r3g;1i’Vrep:’e§e.i1i:i1’ti*aes on i’eem’d. Heiiee, the appeal ainzues.

H.()We\2e-17,:iti”ié§_’tt) ‘b,e'”(ibsei’ved that, since the G0vei’nme.nt. is in

appeal .<§eek'i:j;gi'4t0 question the judgement and decree of

épeifmaneiit injtmction 1"CSil'£1i!]ii]g the appeliant from CiiStL1l"iI)il'1g

..__the pc)sseS.<;ion of the !'CSp()I1CiGE1I. who is now dead, 0thei'wise

3 RSA 370308

iha11 und:':r due p1':__:cc:ss 0%' law. the sauna hz'1vi11g been z:ff'inneci;by

{he Court of firsi -appeal the smte is not pnscludeci §':'op;:..I;;}<;i'z1§;jj

the possession ofthe suit property under due process .<)§_'1a1w~f1"1n

anybody :.:l2,1iming under the mspondtznt.

%3UDeE

d 21