High Court Karnataka High Court

The Union Of India vs Ramesh Metals on 30 November, 2009

Karnataka High Court
The Union Of India vs Ramesh Metals on 30 November, 2009
Author: Ajit J Gunjal
""WW'" ""°°'""""' ""'°"""""""°'A'§?. «flw "M "'*""*W"""'"""%flW"""R fififiwfifi wwwwa *o.c5W' wmmwmmamawm l"lE\&'9K"V wwwmva WW" !'&i"'\W'f&5'%iWJW°flW""i4 %'"€'e$'WW§ MWWWE WW flfififiiwfiflfiififlflfl WIEKWW WWW"

.1.

B? THE I-II€§£-I COURT 0F KARNATAKA AT  T.

nxrm nus 'rim mm mm: or mvmvmm   %7  J % 

BEFORE

'mm Hownnn nmmsncx  *     , 

 

BE'I'W%:

Repr%edby.'1'l1c  Qfficex,

South WmemR1im'1way,:; .. *

 %   %  1;

2- '3'11¢7<1'3*1i'=f' ifitmwfiafit),
scum Wwtnm   L %
13,      
Ban,ga1ox°r.$6004__6-  

 

13; mm Road,

L % L  fagagazm seams. mpmmb
   N.s.smjay Gewda. Adv.)

Mia Rmwh Maals,
A Propziaay Firm,
Raprww by its 801:: Pmém,



wewas 0! wu&'¢mwUM=a

'E MWWBFW W5" wmmwmmmikfl Wswm mwwm  mflmiwmfimmm Wiwm mwwfim we" ::wwwmms:M¥w~a Wnww wwwmm mm" wwmnwmnmuwwe WHIWIWK mm-mum: ww- awawmmmamwww M

Sri. Runes}; Mews,
59~13-3?, Gaysxinw,
Vfiaywma 520988,,

mm Pradesh.  if    ' ~

(By Sri. Smtpa Baa, Adv.)

Cflfiflfflfifl

This Writ Petition is fled    
the Constfiufien of Infia  the'  dmed
25.7.2009, paced by the VI "VA I1}_dgje,% Bmgalme City

in A.A.No.523f09 Vida     .

This Writ pmim    ham' this
d8¥~%*wC°ufim%5d#'¥*#f°11¢W**'%=   
 ' ' ' '     
 _  wtnmal mecpts mafia: for

W     %

  by the respondent uméu

% Act sea Arbitraflon Appmm
ax agpfimm ww 3130 mmmd fez
The mm Trial Judge has mm the mad
As was: gm of the said apphasann, the

, is wfora fig Cetut.

3.SIi.Smjay(§awda.Leatnedcemm1@wariIzgfcr1’t11e
pflcrnsmsabmifithathavfingrmmdtetbsfaettlxdastmzaf

m:v”mw~a\:a:””si wwiswarvam Wwwwmm WW .. _ M _ _ _ M _ _
“”W'”N'”fi’M”‘V~Mf”‘%fl’Mf”$e &?<lW"éedMYt wwwmw Weft? uwmmawwamfiww XII'??? WWW"! 'fix-W5 %'%WEi'4'3fiW33""fi¥'k£""€|. 50""W-ii'§$i"ifi"B WWWW3 Kl!" WWQMEWMEMWW I'"fi%'h3'E'1! %\lWW

.3.

2.5.4.54: was is m. an zmpugwa order could not have
pmea wmm notice to the petitioner. He fmther
it is am the; this petitiomr was with T
which an due fiam the Wm

erdesrisfiabletobemhed.

4. sea. smga: the

rcspondmt submits that bcftms
connselis could not have
filmdthis wzn appxiaamm mm :11:

A A of the impwuad erdar.

g%$t.’!1epet:1iomsi:::ea1m3

XX wfich has nat hm am. Indeed, tha
armmaarwbyumzmned Trail Judgc. If
mm’ ‘ is mad: tbs ms shall he mam-ad’ and

axpmaofwahauapaiod emgmmmaomaudaasf

1%

fi”‘lIi\Wf””!2 fiwhfififiwl WWI’ fl’Nl””‘lW’\«IWJ”‘kHl”&I*t&W”Q muwarmi wmmwm

“E “Ma-MWWKIE Qwlf” WFKHEVHEMRWK VIEW?” %¥JwW,K«@fiW”‘flfi\M§WMfiM%%’ KTEMWW Wmfiuflkfifififl MW!” mmmwmtsmmtm RKWJW WWW”! VII’ nmnnvmammm

.4.

mamgmc Itis also am forth: mrnnmo
his objeaioasto mm Hume, the followimg :g._ – 3 _

CREW.

It is apenforthn wl:uonn1’s’ ‘ to 4′

Judge. zmchappemonis mm
and mm at’ wiflint a s date of
mamgtlxe V ms ” ‘ fie
is ebjactions té dkpoud or

FUDGE

» fig,