-- V ReveziaVe""I}cpa1't1nent,
MtSV.Bui3(1iI1g, ~1.
V 1 S2'. Commissioner,
" E 4. 'Assistant Commissioner,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED TI-{IS THE 15% DAY OF SEPTEMBER V
BEFORE " _ %
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT .
WRIT PETITION NO. 15349/2oo4(scE–Ef1*)E%E % ; ‘E
BETWEEN: %{ %
Sri.’I’hiImnaiah,
S/ojatc Yarrajah,
Age: 48 ymrs,
Ooc: Cooli,
N.S.Je11iCrusher, __ . _ –
Kcmpanna Angel” V V V ‘
(By _Smt£f’admaVxVratf;i_ »’S.~»§avanur, Adv.)
1; Isiatg
Rt:ptc:scntet_} its
Sears-;taxy,. _ ‘
. A A’.’Cfx m District,
Tarikcrc Sub-Division,
Tarikcre.
. Dr.Narex1dra,
S/okudrappa,
Vishwanatha Nursing Home,
Halcflagarag Bhadravathi.
(By Sri.R.Devdass, AGA for R1 to’R3,” « ._ -3 . V ” ‘
Sri.Lakshn:1inarayan, Adv. fdr R4) A. ‘
M
This writ petition is filed At1;i(:’1¢;:V§.s”*2§36
227 of the Constitution of india ‘prayer”to__qu§ish
the ordar dated 22.09.2093 by R2 the” 13.0.,
Chikkamagalur District, “” ; ‘ _ xmr _Annexm’e
‘J’ and the orcim’ dated A.C.,
Tarikcrc Sub~Divisé<;fi,, =1{id¢A1'-1;1cxt§3'¥3 'D'.
This writ this day,
thccomt madcv a
_ Th3c_;fptfitiofie’I’ be the 1% representative
An extent of 2 acres of land was
of the petitioner pursuant to the
I966. The same was granted on a
” price 91′ Rs.100/- and Podhi fees sf
_ a condition that the lam snan not be
‘ fog’ a period of 15 yms. Stfioe it to say that
original g’antce Yarraiah alienated the said Land
pursuant to a reg’stcred exchange deed in favour of one
fl
-3-
Thimmappa in vioiafion of the conditions of the
Copy of the said deed is at Annexure ‘C’. _
Thimmappa had sold the land in: 3 d
respondmlt pursuant to a
petitioner filed an = u
Commissioner under the Prcl. The
Assistant _app1icat.ion
pursuant to his o1fd<mf_ 1 that the
petitioner was. mg; g he is the
legal said order was
before the Deputy
Commissiontfig. the appeal. Indeed
has qucsticsncd the same order
.n'.V'§;ts'1__ has found that he had dismissed
of the pefitioner on an earlia oowsion
' the same order on 26.02.2002. Hence, he
dd to entertain the same.
the Deputy Oommissioner. The
2. I have perused the impugned orders passed by
I
fig
the Deputy Commissioner as well as the Assistmntfl
.4-
Commissioner and also heard the learned
appearing fix’ the parties.
3. The claim of the petitioner 1~.as
solely on the gmund that he has notméeté .
that he is the legal representativfe the
Indeed before lodging a is
required to prove that theya
of the on-igml of the
grant. They that they belong
to the deprfeeeegi of any material
to show satisfied the ixwedients,
I am of is not mlfitled to the
of Assistant Comm issioner was
the same has attamed’ final1ty’
es’ has not been questioned anywhere.
‘ a clear case of constructive’ res jud1ea1;a’ .
I do not find any merit in this petition.
VT “-‘Petition stands re}ected’ .
Rule discharged.
4. Mr.R.Devdass, teamed Additiona}
Advocate appeafmg for respondctnts 1 to 3 is ~ _
to file name ofappearance within R1131′ weeks. V
SP8