_
‘Fi1£.St,éiic_ofKa1nata3(a
£9 . 1\)”‘
IN THE HIGH COURT ore’ KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 3″! DAY 01:’ NOVEMBER,
PRESENT _ x’k:
THE HOWBLE MR.JUS’I’ICE DEEPAK V§§§’?h5%’3\.T/1 ”
THE I-IONBLE MR.JUSTIi,1Ei{ R}§hriAb§f€:§;V
WRfI’APPE_AL M€};~..6__2I§9f.2f003 T’
BETWEEN: * ~ ~
Tmmma’
S/0 Peddaiah, J .
Rio Hirekcm HobIiE::, ”
M01akah:auru’TaIuk”.V _ _’
Chitrafi:-urga £)ist1*§,&:t, % ” __ Appellant
% Karegorwda, Adv.)
V , ‘ ».i_ts Cognmissioncr
” ‘ .of*R’evenu¢
; Tfics Illeputy Commissioner
V “‘_.Chitra£lurga District
‘ Cihitzradurga
The Sub~–e:liv1’siona1 Oficcr
Chitradurga Sub–Div11
Chjtxadmga
order dated 4-$2003. The aforesaid facts hafie’ ‘zgfogfi
disputed before 115. Thus, for all u
appeal has been rendered l.I}.fi’11C’§IlIV_t:.”~11S~ .,,4” j.
3. Learned counsel £231″ aypcliaizth sub’7£12i:1;i:cf:I ,
viéw of aliotmcnt of a1tcmativé’Vi;’=a;V;.§ic2 to does not
ear» =..
Wish to prose-cutc this mom. “fisppcal
aoconcungry
dismisacd as having bcéh Parts’ .5 to
bear their Q
Sd/-
Judge
5_é/-
II;'(&g’e
% L , 7’39,