High Court Karnataka High Court

Thippakka vs Syed Anwar on 15 September, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Thippakka vs Syed Anwar on 15 September, 2008
Author: V.Gopalagowda & K.N.Keshavanarayana
C

I: was 14:93 cautrr as xcaammxa A'! 

warm *rn:m was 15"" may as 539':-mmxp._.$f{iibé5.fj[:~.. 

Pfllfillfi

was Koran: nag. auswzczt 15!,  

fiI$.fl
my &§C!!'EL 1m..1ua'r:x:::s u"2.:,§*.mafiAvAfiiAa:AY}gn4

it . E' .2; . mi '.~~3~.:i5a*:"f,}'V.'=z'i::}v:';ai5_

arms:   '
1.

Thi§gakka,H3G §éarsC« “W
WYa.iate Hbnnura§ya_>”V”

2.3hiv2mm3;.2£5yfiérs ”

€?o.i§te Hhnnu:ag§a_ 2

3.Ebnnura3wamyg.1iCyaé£$”«”

3!c.l;te Hfinnuxapgs;.” 5
Miner tagreséntafi by 3″‘

__ApgelE§nt*a$ nafiu;a1’guarfiian.

vOȎ%Ma;iam#a,,?%,yaars

E¢the£xaf,§¢nmu£ggpa
acc:Emuséwi£a»§’

CO Ail éflé xégifiants af Chikkahalii

?illage, flhallakere Taluk

“”‘«’i.”.’A”-;==i:’2r~&’?? am. 2e2:>;=:~’mNrss

‘ ‘JERT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HEGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH

flay 5ri.a.x.siddappa, Adwnoate:

.5. l 5:2:

-nnfiuunnuaué-nu–unu

C”«,i.3ye§ Anwar, Mafia:

—- —vw-\- vi |\.Hni\E!-\hFil\.l-\ HKUQ1 QC)

Sfa.$hadulla 3ab,R$ Gwnez 65 bus
&a.XAf1fif?298,Rfa.flay3kanahslli
Chaliakere Taiuk.

V

._ .. w_..,_.’.. Mil” Mmmnm mun count cw KARNATAKA HIGH COURT or KARNATAKA a-non com or KARNATAKA I-HGH c

-r

2.Tha Biviaiensl Managar
fiatinnai Insuranza Camgany
Limitmd, niviaicnal Qffica
Chigateri Marcantila Euildiag

Eavanagere.

(By 8.71.A..H.VenI;a:t:ash, Aaivocattffi £§:i”B.¥’a = ‘
R»1 sarvndz *. 1″=’ T4

-5

T2315 Bfigsgeal is filed 1.1?’-$.1V73€1}«–Aqf ?{;’i.4′.A€:t
againat tha judgment: and, award “dated “i5:S.20D6
gaased in MV€.Hs.1é3fiQ§ an §he*file_af the Civil
Judge¢Er.En3 and Afiditinnai; MA¢T,”»Challakere,
gartrg allawing tag’; c1aim’ petition for
snmgensatinn éfand ‘ seeg:ggg;_ annancement cf
ccmpansatian.¥ ‘3.’ :1 i ” “A =’«–

This éggé§;V éam$fi§’ fin: E93 admissian this
day, E£$Hm%§§&fi&EA£¢yJ,afieiivered the fell0wing:~

ffifiugh thg $Q§éal is listed far admi5$ion,

= _5y¢¢¢§fisfifi%:”af’ gaiéias, the agpaal is haard on

ma:it5;v V.”

tfimgéingf dissatisfiad with tha quantum at

ux* §@mggg$a£i&n awrdafi fly’ tha Tribunal, tha
. gr.;:3.;.aiEaa’,at’§:te: in kfi?C..E»}o.1é3f¥.’M an the file of civiz.
: §uagei3r.Bfi§and Mhsf, Chitzadurga District have

A “§re3ented this aggeal seeking enhancement of

camgenaatian.

&/

…g;59r:§f2.\_I’n?¥1§}s ._ 3 ” –.

…. Wm… ‘LIT’ .u.m….«..\.-. ruvr: Lqutg: Ur mmnwxa Hzcm COURT or KARNATAKA HIGH COURT or KARNATAKA HIGH COURT or KARNATAKA HIGH cu

aftar deducting 1I3″‘ cf the 53mg teward$x §fie
gerscnai exgenses and maintenanca _.§f # §§§t ‘
daceasad, reckaned the annual 1933 Qf”d$§§fi&§n¢y,u”
at R5.24,UDQ!–. By taking@’tfi#lTfig§ §f* fifi§ E

dacaasad as EU yaars, tha._Tri5ufi§l ap§1;§§. fhé”

multigliar af 11 anfi qfifih%ifi5dV tbe 5l$§s cf
&apenfiencyT at Rs;§5fi4,G§§ff; _ fin. fifiixfi the
Tribunal adfied anGthe%{*%gfi{ §f’,fi$;gé;Q9Gf*- being
cemgenaatimn gnfi§§–c¢§v§fi§iGfi$£fh§§§§ and awarded
tstal :am§$fi§a§i$fi.: §fi”,§§:$,8?,0fifif–. Tha
camgan35ticmTb§%$fi§t:”fi§g fiifiaaéed to be paid. by
tha in3§z9r;afTt§§ aifé§§§fi§ yua with intarast at

5% gee: a3’§V§}”;;!’£§i cfiate Qf getition tit: the

_.._::Lat’.e “g;=3*;,rmseV.&3″t:–g.____’_fj1f:Ae3;v claimants are dissatisfied

fiwith.uth§w_q§an§um qf campensatian. Therefore,

tfifi? §xé”§$,3§§éal hafara thia Caurt.

§.~v ;E§¢n sarvice’ cf natice sf the appeal,

‘” féégdfiéant Na.2 has apgaarad through ita learnaa
»_”@m$§sal. Rsagcnfient Ha.1 ins§ite cf service cf

“afiéfiica af agpaal has remained absent.

5. WE have hearfi hath aidaa.

K-,6!-1 COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COUST OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH CI

gaat-«mcrtam repczrt issued by the dOCt£3I?.V_V:’=.’§L’3E.vv

rasgmzzt :22′ the tieceasaaeci. In the
regent, the age vi” the deceasegpis ‘~40
years. in the absence sf afig

accagétablé evidence with .re~g_a;rd V€:<:fF°"cha

ciacasaefi, the age 3:3 i_2f} fihe."_V§:aVfit.z§gartam
szepcsrt can baa saféfiy Ogirébahla.

Therefare, we h-rum is mt
justifiad in ‘:$.Oi’O’1’–f;h-;’§___V:§i#Vr.:ea$e:3 as 50
ysaars. V”‘aifg$–‘af tha ciaacaasad
as ::saaI’:?,i”a§ésa.»:¥:.V.;’:.§;f:.;’:fii$’:%’if+ ii} as gar m.Pé..- Bra
halzi fh-fix aged 49 years as an

the ::’ateVVV’O«–._«fi.fv. V’§:_3.Os._v”‘§ii&ath. Therefore, the

.-v.,af:gg:s§g§–;iva_”teV ;nfiOlt2Z,p}_.__igr wt;u.:3.»=:.% be 14 and mt 11 em

AV_§§.*;;§.%;:Z=$§ Tribunal.

assaesaing the age cf the fie.-sceased

5!} *,e,*e*-‘§a3’z.*3, tam Tribunal has ameaaed the ciaily
:”§.:O_O3’i’ar<'2.;<3V%':I$'=§«_. zxxf tha dmztaasad at B.5.1{3E3;"-. The
O"~-___"":<'.':l$3'.m&nt3 imam grafiucafi RTE: mi thé landaari

u'*.§}.V*'$pe.r1:§r flamed by the fiaceasad at Ex.P6.

Hswewr, tha mama of the maths: of the aieczeaaed

fifififi placte in the ETC. Nevertheless the

b

»,Tzibufi§l;"

….. ……… …..- nnnivnlnnfl mm Lgug: ur mmnsnm HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT or KARNATAKA HIGH comer on KARNATAKA HIGH (:1

1%

@. .A¢carfiingly; the sggeal. is allaw;fi g@n
gart %nhancing the camgensatinn ta Rs.{g§§;§§§g;¢ fl
as againat R3*2,8?,G9Qf– award§q_§y the ff§§fi@a;.;u
Tha enhanced camgensatien _a§ l7fié,é@§1;$fiGg?;

ixupaas Twfi Lakh aha 0&9 ,Thausg§& Gaiy} wsh41l

carry intarast at fi% P.#}, from’ thé’5d§;e cf

gatitian till paymafifiefl f§n§ “é§%énfi reépéndentw

insurer is directea *.té :gay *[§hé efihanced

cemgensation tdggfihe$_wi$fi ifi$§rg$§’§ithia eight
waaka fram £$§ géfig Ef ifi¢§ifi§ hf ccpy cf this
judgma3t;” ffi§’gggarfiflfifiméfitwéflfi fiisbursamant cf
énhssaa§ ;¢¢§e#§étfian éfi§§§§t tha claimants shall

ha in :h% a$ame §r§§$%tion a3 fiirected by the

Sdl-1
Iudge

Sal;

Judge

*albf~.