High Court Kerala High Court

Thrikkovilvattom Grama … vs Farook on 4 September, 2008

Kerala High Court
Thrikkovilvattom Grama … vs Farook on 4 September, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

CRL.A.No. 287 of 2007()


1. THRIKKOVILVATTOM GRAMA PANCHAYAT,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. FAROOK,
                       ...       Respondent

2. STATE OF KERALA,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.SUBASH CHANDRA BOSE

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.GIRI

 Dated :04/09/2008

 O R D E R
                        V.GIRI, J
                      -------------------
                     Crl.A.287/2007
                     --------------------
        Dated this the 4th day of September, 2008

                      JUDGMENT

The Panchayath which is the complainant in

S.T.No.2086/2002 on the files of the Judicial First Class

Magistrate-II, Kollam, is the appellant herein. The

complaint was filed alleging that the accused had

committed an offence punishable under Section 210 of

the Panchayat Raj Act read with Rule 26 of the Taxation

and Appeal Rules, 1963. One K.M.Joseph, the Panchayat

Secretary had filed the complaint. Apparently on

16.5.2005, the Court directed the complainant to be

present on 11.8.2005. In the meanwhile, then Panchayat

Secretary was transferred. In the circumstances, an

adjournment was sought for and the case was posted to

7.10.2005. Apparently, an application was made on

behalf of the Secretary on 7.10.2005 for excusing the

absence of the complainant. This was rejected and the

accused was acquitted under Section 256(1) of Cr.P.C.

This has been challenged in appeal.

Crl.A.287/2007
2

2. Though served, the accused has not appeared

before this Court.

3. In view of the facts narrated above and having

heard learned counsel for the appellant, I am of the

view that the Panchayat/complainant is entitled to

another chance to prosecute the complaint.

4. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed. Order of

acquittal is set aside and the complaint is restored to file.

Court below shall further proceed with

S.T.No.2086/2002 in accordance with law.

Parties shall appear before the Court below on

24.11.2008.

V.GIRI,
Judge

mrcs