High Court Karnataka High Court

Thunga Rice And Oil Industried Ltd vs State Of Karnataka on 23 February, 2010

Karnataka High Court
Thunga Rice And Oil Industried Ltd vs State Of Karnataka on 23 February, 2010
Author: Mohan Shantanagoudar


— wxqwrv 1:7! I\r1I\!Ir’I1.l’\1 ‘ T’! \.-ilhllfll ‘Jr l\F\KI’-F\’5’\”-f’ ‘1I’J”

1

at nm HIGH com? 01:’ KARRATAKA AT Baxezxzma
DATED THIS TI-IE 23¢ BAY cm FEBRUAR§2é1a’ ~

THE HONBLE MKJUSTIQE

WRIT PETITION NO.22¥3–£§:D~.§i?F 2GQ”§(G I§Ié’¥R}E’S)
BETVEEN: E” % ” E

THUHGA RICE & OIL INDqs€E1E$j;?B,
2 H 203$; “. f” 1 e.’aTvL
SHIMQGA A=v :*””~f
REP. BY,I?3j€HA£RAn*
331 R G3MA$3UfiA?H =2

}..’?£T:?zoNER

(By 3ni:G.$f;NEfi§ISH fiGHnfi;”E$V., FOR
3 SRI.RuB $AQA31VA?EA; AflY.,§

Afifi :

1 A$?ETE as KRREATAKA
.43ER; BY E?$_$$CRE?ARY
“~RE?EfiEs BE?ART%Efl%

. *._M.$»3§:s3:§G
‘ _ agxgagaa3f§5ee01

2_ TfiE_DE?fiTY C9MI3$ZONER
*$H:MeaA nxswxxcr
n Zifiuk ?AN¢HAYET R0&B
‘n _ 333M053 ..* aassaxnsgws

‘” ‘;3y.$ri:&AaEwnRa saasxa, ESE? §

TFHIS SR3? PE”E’I’¥’I€3I’i IE FILES Ufifififi ARZFISLE

: 226 Afifi 22? 9? THE CQHSTITUTIGH G? ZRQIE ?RA??NG

‘PG QEIAEE-f THE’ IHPUSKED KQTICEKOREER BT23 25 . 9 . 63
hifi. §’SE¥f¥’E’S:’€ZR 52533–33 ESSEIEQ BY ‘FEE R3 VIEE
A§§§<§§§-"E.

mm a:;mm* W mmmum Wm {cmmm W mmmmm mm mm? W mmmmm mm; mam W mmmmm mm cam? M mmfiamm mam «

3

Slfimoga, had direcbad the Twritory Manw A’
Bharat Pemtxhum Ctzxrpcsrratitm Limited,
shift M]s.Vijay Service Station
suitable place. It in also

that the Deputy
nmwaary cooperation
Station Retro! hunk in 1: as aha
maemimad in the property
third party to get

that ha is the ewnw ofthe

E!fs.Vi_iaya, sewm Statzinn Petrol
He k mt tha Wm of M/a.Vijaya
Peuol Bunk. Mlmvijaya mm Station

A 1 * is the mm af M[a.Bharafl’1 Petroleum

T ‘ Lmiwd. Timrafore, than Eeputy
_’4_4’4jsfl;¥mmissin:wr, mm’ m amzm an Terrimry

Mamet’ of M] 3. Bharath Pemmeum Ciarpcrafinzx Iimiteci
m 513% M[s.’a”ijaya S-351:3 Statinn Pam}, Bunk ta

K,..,,>»

wmm «mum; W mmmmm Mia;-~a’§i.;*£:’..f:am_.:.,m’a? W mawmmm imam mam? 09 mxwamm mm; cmmr W KARNATAKA WGH cwum W mamamm a»m:~§<

4

a.mthe:r auitable plaae. In athar words, thas lessee A’
suitable place in the smma: af -p’ub3icA.
pa-gem, me pemoner, if has 5;

question will get back his
‘v”.§?~nfia:f/C*|j ” 3
pafitionar will be eff the petitiorm.
Thm’6fore, the haa to quaafion
the native ‘m relevant to
note that %za_:;;%xa§§ya.*%% fitatiszsn Petral
Bunk my ‘f»{ia ..Bvhara’«”Vt1i: Vvcarpcration Lmimd,

notice :.fi A 3 ciear that, they lrmve

V Ifit is no, the: pcfitionot cmzrmtz

V flggfitfin An%u1wa~B, as he does not mus: 4
He wm mt m gamma by mm mm: at an.
E A the peaanw is the arm cf the pmperty, ha
get back the pxmiaos as: the mmnt vamtvzas the
Ifany right arm peciaam $3 vmam, it as

RM?

mm»; mm: W ammwmmmm Ham: grmam W mmmmm mm mm? W mmarmm Ham»: mum W KARNAWWA MW mum W mmmzmm mm %

5

epm far the potitiemr to approach the A’

cammm inner mm’ ‘ damages! ‘ _

4. Learned Gavt. Ream

behalf af rapomicnta sulmts .


bum: mum, wwch  mm
the    It *3 alas
Imugh:   tint the dispute as

pcrming Ciourt Such a disputed

qumtinn ‘mm’ in 1113′ writ’ petItmn’ ‘ .

_ &%’1.’t:1g”” patina’ ‘ :1 fails and; the same is

Sd/–

JUDGE

:*mn;26,2.1a