High Court Kerala High Court

Thyagarajan @ Swapalchandran vs State Of Kerala on 17 January, 2008

Kerala High Court
Thyagarajan @ Swapalchandran vs State Of Kerala on 17 January, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 250 of 2008()


1. THYAGARAJAN @ SWAPALCHANDRAN,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.A.MUHAMMED RAFFI

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

 Dated :17/01/2008

 O R D E R
                           R.BASANT, J.
                        ----------------------
                   B.A.Nos.250 & 251 of 2008
                    ----------------------------------------
           Dated this the 17th day of January 2008

                               O R D E R

These applications are for regular bail. The common

petitioner faces allegations in two separate crimes both under

the Kerala Abkari Act. He was allegedly found to be in

possession of 3 litres of arrack on 23/10/2007 and 7 litres of

arrack on 9/9/2007. The petitioner was arrested on 13/12/2007

in the crime of the Kottarakkara excise range. Arrest was

recorded in the other crime on 29/12/2007. The petitioner

continues in custody from that date.

2. The learned Public Prosecutor points out that the

petitioner is accused in two other crimes also, both registered

under the Kerala Abkari Act. The allegations in that crime relate

to the alleged possession of 3 litres of arrack and 34 litres of

spirit by the petitioner, submits the learned Public Prosecutor.

The learned Public Prosecutor opposes the application in these

circumstances.

3. I find merit in the opposition by the learned Public

Prosecutor. In the wake of the opposition by the learned

Public Prosecutor, regular bail can be granted to the petitioner

B.A.Nos.250 & 251/08 2

only if this court is in a position to entertain the twin

satisfactions under Section 41A of the Kerala Abkari Act. I do

not find any circumstances which can persuade this court to

entertain either of those two satisfactions at the moment. I am

satisfied that these petitions deserve to be dismissed now.

4. In the result, these petitions are dismissed. I may

hasten to observe that the petitioner shall be at liberty to move

this court for bail at later stage of the investigation, not at any

rate, prior to 31/01/2008. The investigating officer shall, in the

meantime, make every endeavour to complete the investigation.





                                             (R.BASANT, JUDGE)
jsr

            // True Copy//      PA to Judge

B.A.Nos.250 & 251/08    3

B.A.Nos.250 & 251/08    4

       R.BASANT, J.




         CRL.M.CNo.




            ORDER




21ST DAY OF MAY2007