Posted On by &filed under High Court, Madras High Court.

Madras High Court
Tirupatiraju vs Rajagopala Kristnama Razu And … on 30 August, 1898
Equivalent citations: (1898) 8 MLJ 271


1. We agree with the Judge that the Article of the Limitation Act applicable is 61, but we find that under that Article the suit is not barred by limitation as the money, in respect of which contribution is sought, was not paid till 31st January, 1894, and this suit was brought on the 5th January 1897.

2. We, therefore, reverse the decree appealed against and remand the suit for fresh disposal. Costs to abide and follow the result.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *

89 queries in 0.145 seconds.