High Court Kerala High Court

Tomy Sebastian vs C.M.Thomas on 14 July, 2008

Kerala High Court
Tomy Sebastian vs C.M.Thomas on 14 July, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WA.No. 733 of 2008()


1. TOMY SEBASTIAN, VALIKULATHIL HOUSE,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. C.M.THOMAS, ST.MARTINS AGENCIES,
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, IDUKKI.

3. COMMISSIONER CIVIL SUPPLIES,

4. THE DEPUTY CONTROLLER RATIONING,

5. THE DISTRICT SUPPLY OFFICER,

6. TALUK SUPPLY OFFICER,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.V.RAJENDRAN (PERUMBAVOOR)

                For Respondent  :ADDL.ADVOCATE GENERAL

The Hon'ble the Chief Justice MR.H.L.DATTU
The Hon'ble MR. Justice A.K.BASHEER

 Dated :14/07/2008

 O R D E R
                H.L.DATTU, C.J. & A.K.BASHEER, J.
               -----------------------------------------------------
                             W.A.No.733 of 2008
                   ----------------------------------------------
                   Dated, this the 14th day of July, 2008

                                 JUDGMENT

H.L.Dattu, C.J.

The 4th respondent in W.P.(C) No.19101 of 2007 is the

appellant in this writ appeal.

2. In fact, the appellant is not aggrieved by the orders

passed by the learned Single Judge, wherein the learned Judge has only

observed that the lis between the parties is pending before the first

appellate authority for consideration and decision and that the appellate

authority can take appropriate decision in the matter.

3. It appears that, after the disposal of the writ petition

when the appeal before the first appellate authority was posted for

hearing, the first appellate authority had expressed his opinion that since

Ext.P6 order has already been confirmed by the learned Single Judge of

this Court, he is not prepared to hear anything else on that issue. There

is no order as such passed by the first appellate authority. Whatever

stated in the writ appeal and also at the time of hearing of the writ appeal

is only hearsay. Normally, we are not expected to take cognizance of

W.A.No.733/2008 -2-

those interactions that has taken place between the counsel and the

District Collector. However, in order to alleviate the semblance of

grievance of the appellant, we only observe that the appellate authority

while deciding the lis between the parties will decide the same in

accordance with law, untrammelled by the observations made by the

learned Single Judge while disposing of W.P.(C) No.19101 of 2007.

Ordered accordingly.

(H.L.DATTU)
CHIEF JUSTICE

(A.K.BASHEER)
JUDGE

MS