High Court Kerala High Court

Tresa Metilda vs Vypin Vishamadhya Koottakola … on 12 April, 2007

Kerala High Court
Tresa Metilda vs Vypin Vishamadhya Koottakola … on 12 April, 2007
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

RP No. 643 of 2001(B)



1. TRESA METILDA
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs

1. VYPIN VISHAMADHYA KOOTTAKOLA VIRUDHA SAM
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.A.X.VARGHESE

                For Respondent  :SMT.VANAJA MADHAVAN

The Hon'ble MR. Justice KURIAN JOSEPH
The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.T.SANKARAN

 Dated :12/04/2007

 O R D E R
                      KURIAN JOSEPH & K.T. SANKARAN, JJ.

                   ...................................................................................

                     R.P. No. 643   OF  2001 IN W.A. 1184 OF 1993

                  ...................................................................................

                                   Dated this the 12th April, 2007




                                                  O R D E R

Kurian Joseph, J:

This Review Petition is filed by 10 persons seeking to review the

order dated 02.07.2001 in C.M.P.No. 136 of 2001 in W.A. 1184 of 1993

in the matter of payment of compensation to the parties affected in the

Vypeen hooch tragedy. In view of the intervening developments, grievance

survives only in respect of the first review petitioner- Tresa Metilda, 4th

review petitioner-Ammini Karunakaran and 9th review petitioner-K.D. Babu.

2. In the statement filed by the District Collector, Ernakulam it is

stated that as far as Ammini Karunakaran is concerned, compensation can

be disbursed to the legal heirs within a short period. As far as K.D. Babu

is also concerned, it is stated that compensation will be paid to him within

a short span of time. Thus, there is objection only with regard to Tresa

Metilda, the first review petitioner. It is stated by the District Collector that

no materials are available to show that Tresa Metilda is the legally

adopted child of late Augustine and that she being a foster child of late

R.P. No. 643 OF 2001 IN W.A. 1184 OF 1993

2

Augustine, compensation cannot be granted to her. Thus there is no

dispute that Tresa Metilda is the foster child of Augustine and Elcy. On

such admitted status, when considered along with the materials produced

by the first review petitioner along with the reply affidavit, whether Tresa

Metilda would be entitled to receive the compensation is the question.

3. Annexure A1 is the will dated 13.05.1997 executed by Elcy, wife

of late Augustine in favour of Tresa Metilda. Annexure A2 is the deed

executed by the brother of late Augustine in favour of Tresa Metilda .

Annexure A3 is the electoral card, wherein Tresa Metilda is shown as the

daughter of late Augustine . Annexure A4 is the certificate issued by the

President of Elamkunnappuzha Panchayat to the effect that Tresa

Metilda is the adopted child of Augustine. Annexure A5 is the identity card

of the Service Co-operative Bank wherein also late Augustine is shown as

the father of Tresa Metilda . Annexures A6 and A7 are copies of ration

cards, wherein also Tresa Metilda is shown as the daughter of late

Augustine. Annexure A8 is the certificate issued by the Parish Priest

certifying that Tresa Metilda is the adopted child of late Augustine and

Elcy. Annexure A9 is the photo copy of the gas distribution slip . Since

there is no statute governing adoption of child as far as christians are

concerned and there being no dispute as to the effect that Tresa Metils is

R.P. No. 643 OF 2001 IN W.A. 1184 OF 1993

3

the foster child of Augustine and all the documents referred to above

would show that Tresa Metilda has been treated , for all purposes, as the

child of Augustine and Elcy, it is only in the interest of justice that the first

review petitioner is to be treated as the eligible claimant for compensation

due to the death of Augustine in connection with Vypeen hooch tragedy.

Therefore, there will be a direction to the District Collector to

disburse the compensation to the first review petitioner also along with the

disbursement of compensation to Ammini Karunakaran and K.D. Babu.

This shall be done within a period of one month from the date of production

of a copy of this order.

Review petition is disposed of as above.

KURIAN JOSEPH,

JUDGE.

K.T. SANKARAN,

JUDGE.

lk

KURIAN JOSEPH &

K.T. SANKARAN, JJ.

………………………………………………..

R.P.No. 643 OF 2001 IN

W.A. No. 1184 of 1993

…………………………………………………

Dated this the 12th April, 2007

O R D E R