Posted On by &filed under High Court, Madras High Court.


Madras High Court
Trichy Premier Ct Scans Pvt. Ltd vs Commissioner Of Customs on 14 November, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATE:  14-11-2008

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN

Writ Petition No.27024 of 2003


Trichy Premier CT Scans Pvt. Ltd.
11B/3, Shastri Road,
Trichy.									.. Petitioner.

Versus

Commissioner of Customs
Chennai Sea Port &
Customs House, Chennai-600 001.					.. Respondent.


Prayer: This petition has been filed seeking for a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the respondent in F.No.KVS/DECLA/61/98, and quash the order, dated 16.2.99, and further direct the respondent to extend the benefit of the Kar Vavad Samadhan Scheme to the petitioner, accepting the declaration No.61/98, dated 16.12.98, filed by the petitioner. 


		For Petitioner	  : Mr.Arun Kurian Joseph for
					     Ms.Pushya Sitaraman

		For Respondent     : Mr.A.Muralidharan
					    Spl.C.G



O R D E R

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent.

2. It has been stated that the petitioner Company had imported whole body scanner with standard accessories, vide Bill of Entry No.01309, dated 10.2.90. The petitioner Company had claimed customs duty exemption, under Notification 64/88 Cus, dated 1.3.88, which is granted subject to the certification by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. Since such a certificate was not available, the petitioner Company had opted for provisional assessment.

3. It has also been stated that the respondent had issued a show cause notice, dated 13.2.98, wherein it was alleged that the importer did not have any hospital, or beds on laboratory or a nursing home. The petitioner Company had only a diagnostic Centre. Since the notification was available only if the assessee provided fresh treatment to 40% of outdoor patients, to all indoor patients and to patients who earn less than Rs.500/- per month, the show cause notice had proposed to confiscate the goods and to impose a penalty. The duty liability of the petitioner Company was said to be Rs.20,29,665/-.

4. While so, the Central Government had formulated the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme for quick and early resolution of the pending disputes. Therefore, the petitioner had filed an application, under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, on 16.12.98, seeking the settlement of the dispute pending, vide show cause notice F.No.S23/24/90/(pt)hrv13, dated 13.2.98. The said show cause notice had been challenged by way of a writ petition in W.P.No.4405 of 1998. However, the respondent, who was the designated authority, under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, had issued an order, dated 16.2.99, rejecting the declaration on the ground that there was demand of duty, as the duty cannot be demanded after the lapse of five years from the date of the finalisation of the PD Bond and the redemption fine and the penalty were also not quantified. In the meantime, the Supreme Court had declared the law that in case of violation of post importation conditions, the question of limitation does not arise. In such circumstances, the petition filed by the petitioner, under the Kar Vivad Samadan Scheme ought to have been accepted.

5. In the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondent it has been stated that the petitioner Company had imported one set of Toshiba Model “TCL-300s-CT” whole body scan with standard accessories. The consignment was valued at Rs.50,74,163/-. The goods were permitted for home consumption, provisionally, under 64/88, dated 1.8.88, pending production of customs duty exemption certificate from DGHS. While so, the Intelligence Officer of the Directorate General of Anti-Evasion Zonal Unit, Chennai, after inspecting the scanning centre, had submitted a verification report, on 20.9.97, stating that the establishment is only a “Diagnostic Centre” and made out a case for violation of non-fulfillment of post importation conditions, stipulated under CN64/88. Therefore, a show cause notice had been issued to the importers, under Section 124 of the Customs Act, 1962, asking them to show cause as to why the impugned goods should not be confiscated, under Section 111 of the Customs Act, 1962 and as to why a penalty should not be imposed, under Sections 112 and 114(A) of the Customs Act, 1962. In stead of replying to the show cause notice, the importer, vide letter, dated 16.4.98, had informed that they have filed a writ petition before this Court and had requested to treat the writ petition as the reply to the show cause notice. Therefore, the case was adjudicated by the Commissioner, after exhausting the option for PH and levied Rs.10,00,000/- as Redemption fine, Rs.5,00,000/- as penalty and had also demanded a duty of Rs.20,29,655/-, under Section 125(2) of the Customs Act, 1962. In spite of an Order-in-Original having been passed, the importer had opted for the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme and had, accordingly, filed an application before the designated authority. Since there was no demand raised in the show cause notice, the designated authority under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme had rejected the application of the importer on the ground that the duty was not demanded and the Redemption and the Personal penalty was not quantified in the show cause notice. Thus, the department had proceeded with the adjudication order, after observing the principles of natural justice.

6. At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner had submitted that it would suffice if this Court directs the respondent to accept the payment of Rs.10,15,000/-, which is 50% of the duty amount, in accordance with the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998, in view of the show cause notice, dated 13.2.98, demanding a duty amount of Rs.20,29,665/-, within a specified period, as directed by this Court.

7. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent had no objection for this Court passing such an order.

8. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the petitioner, as well as the respondent, the petitioner is directed to pay a sum of Rs.10,15,000/-, as the duty amount, in accordance with the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998, in view of the show cause notice, dated 13.2.98, demanding a duty amount of Rs.20,29,665/-, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

With the above directions, the writ petition stands closed. No costs.

csh

To

Commissioner of Customs
Chennai Sea Port &
Customs House,
Chennai 600 001


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *

103 queries in 0.145 seconds.