Gujarat High Court High Court

Tripathi vs State on 6 May, 2010

Gujarat High Court
Tripathi vs State on 6 May, 2010
Author: Ks Jhaveri,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

SCA/5741/2010	 1/ 3	JUDGMENT 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

SPECIAL
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 5741 of 2010
 

With


 

SPECIAL
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 5733 of 2010
 

To


 

SPECIAL
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 5739 of 2010  
 
For Approval
and Signature:  
 
HONOURABLE
MR.JUSTICE KS JHAVERI
 
 
=========================================================



	 
		  
			 
				 

1
			
			 
				 

Whether
				Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?
			
		
	


	 
		  
			 
				 

2
			
			 
				 

To
				be referred to the Reporter or not ?
			
		
	


	 
		  
			 
				 

3
			
			 
				 

Whether
				their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ?
			
		
	


	 
		  
			 
				 

4
			
			 
				 

Whether
				this case involves a substantial question of law as to the
				interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order
				made thereunder ?
			
		
	


	 
		  
			 
				 

5
			
			 
				 

Whether
				it is to be circulated to the civil judge ?
			
		
	

 

 
===============================================
 

TRIPATHI
SHALINI ARUNKUMAR - Petitioner(s)
 

Versus
 

STATE
OF GUJARAT & 2 - Respondent(s)
 

===============================================
 

 
Appearance
: 
MS KRISHNA U MISHRA
for Petitioner(s) : 1, 
GOVERNMENT
PLEADER for Respondent(s) : 1, 
None for Respondent(s) : 2 -
3. 
=========================================================


 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE KS JHAVERI
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 06/05/2010 

 

 
ORAL
JUDGMENT

1. In
all these petitions the respective petitioners have prayed for a
direction to respondent authority for giving appointment to the
petitioners on the post of Vidhyasahayak in General Stream as
prescribed in the advertisement.

2. In
pursuance of an advertisement issued by District Primary Education
officer, Dahod, inviting applications for appointment on the post of
Vidhyasahayaks, the petitioners had applied and were called for
interview and also verified the documents. Thereafter the petitioners
were informed that since they had studied in Hindi Medium, they will
not be selected for the post in question.

3. Learned
Advocate for the petitioners contended that the disqualification of
the petitioners on the ground that they have studied in Hindi Medium
is totally illegal, arbitrary and unjust and against the
advertisement issued by the authority.

4. Admittedly,
the primary schools of the State of Gujarat, administered through
District Primary Education Officers, are Gujarati medium schools
where students belonging to weaker sections as well as tribal areas,
hill areas, slum areas, boarder areas are studying. Only those
teachers who have studied in Gujarati medium can teach and guide the
students in a better manner. In the advertisement itself it is stated
that the recruitment is for teaching in Gujarati medium schools.
According to the respondents after considering various aspects it
was decided that the recruitment to all the posts of Vidya Sahayaks
should be from the candidates who have studied in Gujarati medium.
In view of the fact that the petitioners are required to teach in
Gujarati Medium school I am of the view that there is no
arbitrariness in the decision of the respondents that the incumbents
must have studied Gujarati medium. Merely knowing Gujarati language
would not be sufficient to teach in Gujarat medium schools. Since the
petitioners have studied in Hindi Medium, it cannot be said that the
decision of the respondent authority is illegal or arbitrary. I,
therefore, do not find any merits in these petitions. The petitions
are therefore dismissed summarily.

(K.S.

Jhaveri,J.)

mary//

   

Top