Tukaram vs Thammanna Since Dead By Lrs on 12 February, 2009

0
221
Karnataka High Court
Tukaram vs Thammanna Since Dead By Lrs on 12 February, 2009
Author: V.G.Sabhahit & A.S.Pachhapure


KNEE? %!s{V¥.§{Héd5ava Raddy, Sma M.Refidy,

EN TEE HEGR CGJRE U3 KRRNATRKR

CiRCUE? BENCH RE GULBRRGR

DATED THIS THE 12Tfi may cw FERRU§RY.fQ®§x .3
yaasmmy:

wag fiGN’ELE NR. Jseficg v.G._sa3R§fi:§*»V’

3-33:13…. V’

TEE ROH’BLE MR =£@§iIC$ Afs; PACHHAPURE

;

BE?WEEN:

Tukaram, u M
égad about ?5 ygagsg
$56. Eittsfia Jifide,
Uqaypatiag: Nil, ‘V
REG. Hsu$e’§a.Zfi5~€8,” “”” ”
Pr0p%r”$hi%a§us,’

§u:b3r§a”§:s:;»§a§ gag. é9?ELLA%TfS

3.%.Kenche Gowfia

and H.Eari3h Sfietty, gave. Eabsenti

fiN§37

‘fffiaamaaaa,
‘SEQ? Vittaba Jinée,

fiéafi ;§;,;§§’

‘E. Rukman: fiai,
E20. late Thammanna fiinde,

:aVprofi%3Q_.

Ex}

Major, R0us@w:fe,
Rio. Chitapur,
Guibazga §ist.–E8E

3.. .1
{:9
REID

Z. Sunil,

SE0. late Thammanna Jinée,
Majcr,

?o£eman, ABE Ltd.,

Shafibad, Guibarga *:st.~b8bsi@§.

3. Rnii,
S53. late Thammanna Jinde,
Maggi: V . .

CEO, Women ETE Collega Ifistru;tQr,” n»’
MSK M131 Road, Gulbarga–38S_lQ1f ;zV f>_¢ RESPQNDENTIS

{Appeal abated agfi;hstER1 vicpaj St, 26.Q§.2UO8.

By Sri. Ameet*KufiaxjDéehp3§d€;f%§v{ for R2 & 3 [absent]
and M/5. K.Appa gas &’:;$fii;ajVKuma:, Advs.

for R2 & 3 Eabséhi}. ‘A” “V 1

it-~5r

_V This BER is filad u{S. 96 0: C?C agaimst the Judgment
anfi dacrafi fit, 2Q»§4.Zfifi6 §assed in 6.3. N@.%39/29¢? cfi the
fila of Eb C232; Judge 35:. Qu.], Eedam, di3mi$$ing the
gait _§G§ “§a§titi0§¢ aaparatg pasgegslon ané futuze mesm@

Tfiié. 33%-ubominq on fez Finai Heazinq, téis day

_ §ab&ahit 3.,’§@iiv@red thg fwllewing:

§Q§§¥%§?

“?k@ case is caiied Gut. ?he iea:n%d ceunsai app@a::nq

‘Ear tha p&rties are absent, §e :e@:esenta:i©n :5 mafia.

kg/5% _

The appaal is dismismed 1:03: new-pr03ecutio:1.–‘_W_ ‘~.

.7 4’ V H

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *