for
" ofindia praying to direct the R1 to issue the: hall
.__ti:si-:r:Vt*. to the pctitiontzx' ibr the cxam;ma' tion m on
_ 3_1.*3._2;2007.
This petition coming on fin' Qniem, this day, thc Court
A "made the fomwing:
1 wp20698.07
:u11i:mmiooumorxAn1IA'ruuxrnAxaAnm
mm» rms 'rim 34" mm? or mm, 2908
nsmm f __ .
um Homnm am. Jus-rm: n.s.pA1'!.L-'- if "7 'L --' 'V' '
wart on 0 3 % V "
nrrwnms: '
Tulika Thnkuria,
D/0 Tartmchandra Thakuria,
Aged about 19 years,
Resident of C.S.I. Compound,
Mission Road,
No.137,LalbaghRoad, _ ._
1.
‘l’hc,EEagist mr dihfi’-vafimtion,’
Visahvcshimziizayfia University,
Ba1Iga1ore’h_1s’titutc ‘c-3f’I’ochnolog3,r,
K;’R.Ra-ad, V.V..?uram,
~Bi’i.jBaia1’_a§t’afihn 3.1-um and Ants, for n-1;
IEl_s.8.V£»Ihi§3i’thy 8 Ants, Adv to: R2)
Thispeaaon is filed under Articles 225 a; 227 ofthc
2 wp20698.07
1. The petitioner has approached this Court
direction to the 1″ mspondent — University to ‘
ticket to her 501’ the exzaminatnb n eomme._nt’mg,’__4
2. it is her case that she
category and is entiflod for being’ V» ittod to of ” L»
Engineering course as she having
secured the requisite the 11 P.U.C.
cxamm lion. 11 P.U.(3. e.xam.tn' ration .§§mciem fbr being
cligibh of Engmccn:ng’ ‘ course.
She “been duly mmzttafl to the
course fizrr V she was mquufi to
first n m {mm
petitioner was not permitted to take the
ex approached this Court seck1ng’ a
the hall ticket’ to her for the c-.xam1na’ tion
” Lon 31. 12.2007.
.3′, not in dispute _that_t;:¢_pqt;i11Toncr chime: the bcncfit
T eligibility in the percentage of marks in the
&
3 wp20698.07
qualifying examination namely [1 P.U.C. on the gmund that she
helongs to Schadukxi Caste of éifiemnt State.
4. A question g who is ~
Scheduled Caste and Scheduled annth.V”gr ” A
who claim’ s the pr1v1k:gcs’ ‘ given’ _?
Scheduled ‘1’riI)e in the State ¢f__’I<§ama._ in as *
mlmission to the B.E. ooqrses Itfiiuiafions
framed by the ma V such
N44 e/Lh'HeJ+04MJ%£o
admissions /Lfcli 3»: Court in a
connected considering the
respective Conn has held that a
candid' ate_ mt entitled to chim the
privilege Cast: and Sciuadulad Tribe
of the gm: because the said candidate
to apasmfl um specified in the State of his
W} " j!..u.?aud came or Scheduled Tribe. This
" fioflowing the judgment of thc
Bench of the Apex court in Harri cu%
vs. Dogs, Sufi: e.s__.nwmaz Collage and
of can cmmeue ta sawmxoa cause «me
than the t~
' . W . I i" I ." I hfir ]. 3].!
the naatacr to the Univerdty thmgh such
4 wp20698.07
Sehadulodfifiamflicfibauofflahauahtumdmu.
Vs. (mien o]'Iudia&Anr. ¢4m1994 scwsaog.
5. The moss in this case and the mast” sought an .
the am: involved in Writ Petition Q ”
petifion ‘m also Hawcvcr, :t§¢’%i&i’
writ petition this Court has VA
ofthc flees collected towards the :e*s_w
host:-:1 charges, L of the
din:c°mn’ s issusm in the oonnt-r’mu :_j1+, 73a mama
today. to the student tmoxiginal
oertnficalr’ if 35% it. Pctaaioner 55 also held
Rs.5,000]- ashrespoment-Cdlcgc has
sdf…
Judge