High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Tun Tun Bishwakarma vs The State Of Bihar on 17 June, 2010

Patna High Court – Orders
Tun Tun Bishwakarma vs The State Of Bihar on 17 June, 2010
                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               Cr.Misc. No.20737 of 2010
                  TUN TUN BISHWAKARMA SON OF LATE JAGO MISHTRI
                                            Versus
                                  THE STATE OF BIHAR
                                        -----

2. 17.6.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the

offence under sections 420, 465, 466, 467, 468, 471, 473/34 of

the Indian Penal Code and 17 of the Criminal Law Amendment

Act.

Considering that the petitioner is in custody since

16.1.2010 and has no criminal antecedents, let the petitioner,

named above, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of

Rs. 5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount

each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Munger

in Kharagpur P.S.case No.20 of 2010, subject to the conditions

(i) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner,

who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is

related with the petitioner. The bailors will undertake to furnish

information to the court about any change in the address of the

petitioner, (ii) that the affidavit shall clearly state that the

petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is, he

shall not be released on bail, (iii) that the bailor shall also state

on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the

petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after

his release in the present case and thereafter the court below

will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail
-2-

on the ground of misuse and (iv) that the petitioner will give an

undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given

date and be present on the date fixed for charge and if he fails

to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner,

his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse.

The fact that the petitioner has no criminal

antecedents will be verified by the Magistrate concerned before

releasing the petitioner on bail.

Narendra/                          ( Anjana Prakash, J. )