U.N.Thampy vs Travancore Devaswom Board Rep.By … on 8 April, 2010

       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 12391 of 2010(Y)


1. U.N.THAMPY,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD REP.BY ITS
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE COMMISSIONER, TRAVANCORE

3. THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.S.KRISHNAMOORTHY

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice P.R.RAMAN
The Hon'ble MR. Justice P.S.GOPINATHAN

 Dated :08/04/2010

 O R D E R
            P.R.RAMAN & P.S.GOPINATHAN, JJ.

                  -------------------------------

                 W.P.(C) No.12391 of 2010
                  -------------------------------

             Dated this the 8th day of April, 2010

                        J U D G M E N T

Raman, J.

In view of Ext.P1 order, there is no justification for

delaying the work. Even though it is found that the tender was

invited and there were no bidders, necessarily, fresh steps will

have to be taken, in accordance with law, for construction of

Oxen shed at Ettumannoor Temple in terms of Ext.P1.

The writ petition is closed with the above

observation.

P.R.RAMAN, JUDGE.

P.S. GOPINATHAN, JUDGE

nj.